¡¡Zhu Guodong,Liu Xingjian,Li Aiwu.Comparative efficacy analysis of pneumovesical modified nipple versus Cohen ureteral reimplantation for infantile primary obstructed megaureter[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,,():365-370.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-20251030-00028]
Comparative efficacy analysis of pneumovesical modified nipple versus Cohen ureteral reimplantation for infantile primary obstructed megaureter
- Keywords:
- Megaloureter; Infant; Laparoscopy; Ureteral Reimplantation; Therapeutic Effect; Retrospective Study
- Abstract:
- Objective To compare the clinical outcomes and safety of pneumovesical modified nipple ureteral reimplantation versus pneumovesical Cohen ureteral reimplantation for primary obstructed megaureter (POM) in infants.Methods For this retrospective cohort study,the relevant clinical data were retrospectively reviewed for 56 POM infants from January 2015 to October 2024.According to specific surgical approaches,they were assigned into two groups of Cohen (n=27) and modified nipple (n=29).Operative duration,intraoperative volume of blood loss,duration of postoperative hematuria,length of postoperative hospitalization stay,complication rates and postoperative ultrasonic parameters (ureteral diameter,anteroposterior pelvic diameter & renal cortical thickness) were compared between two groups.Results Two cases in Cohen group required intraoperative conversion into open surgery while no conversion occurred in modified nipple group.Operative duration[(97.93¡À12.14) vs.(125.59¡À14.50)min],duration of postoperative hematuria[(2.10¡À1.08) vs.(2.74¡À1.02)day]and length of hospitalization stay[(9.45¡À2.26) vs.(12.04¡À4.47)day]were all significantly shorter in modified nipple group than those in Cohen group (all P<0.05).Intraoperative volume of blood loss and hospitalization expenses did not differ markedly between two groups (P>0.05).Over a follow-up period of 13 months to 9 years,ureteral diameter was smaller in modified nipple group than that in Cohen group[(0.58¡À0.17) vs.(0.71¡À0.19)cm,P<0.05]while other ultrasonographic parameters showed no significant between-group differences (P>0.05).Febrile urinary tract infection occurred during stenting in modified nipple group (n=2) and Cohen group (n=3); all improved with antibiotic therapy and did not recur after stent removal.In Cohen group,voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) at 3 months postoperatively revealed grade I vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) without symptoms (n=1).It self-resolved after 1-year follow-up.In modified nipple group,one case of grade ¢ò VUR was identified at 6 months postoperatively without clinical symptoms disappeared after 10-month follow-up.Conclusions Both ureteral reimplantation techniques are efficacious for infantile POM.Pneumovesical modified nipple ureteral reimplantation,with its relatively simple procedure,minimal trauma and faster recovery,better aligns with the physiological characteristics of infantile bladder,making it a preferred surgical approach for infantile POM.
References:
[1] ³ÂÅôÓî, ÀîÊØÁÖ.¶ùͯԷ¢ÐÔ¾ÞÊäÄò¹ÜÖ¢µÄÕïÁÆÏÖ×´[J].ÖлªÐ¡¶ùÍâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾, 2023, 44(2):182-188.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20211109-00546. Chen PY, Li SL.Current status of diagnosing and managing primary megaureter in children[J].Chin J Pediatr Surg, 2023, 44(2):182-188.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20211109-00546.
[2] Boswell TC.Advancements in surgical management of megaureters[J].Curr Urol Rep, 2024, 25(9):215-223.DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01214-8.
[3] ¹ú¼ÒÎÀÉú½¡¿µÎ¯Ô±»áС¶ùÄÚ¾µÍâ¿Æ×¨¼ÒίԱ»á, ÖлªÒ½Ñ§»áС¶ùÍâ¿ÆÑ§·Ö»áÃÚÄòѧ×é, ÖйúҽʦлáС¶ùÍâ¿ÆÒ½Ê¦·Ö»á, µÈ.¶ùͯ¸¹Ç»¾µÆø°òë×ÊäÄò¹ÜÔÙÖ²Êõ²Ù×÷Ö¸ÄÏ(2024°æ)[J].ÁÙ´²Ð¡¶ùÍâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾, 2024, 23(11):1001-1008.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202410048-001. Expert Committee of Pediatric Endoscopy, National Health Commission, Group of Urology, Branch of Pediatric Surgery, Chinese Medical Association, Branch of Pediatric Surgery, Chinese Medical Doctor Association.Operative Guideline of Laparoscopic Pneumovesical Ureteric Reimplantation in Children (Edition 2024)[J].DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202410048-001.
[4] Farrugia MK, Hitchcock R, Radford A, et al.British Association of Paediatric Urologists consensus statement on the management of the primary obstructive megaureter[J].J Pediatr Urol, 2014, 10(1):26-33.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.018.
[5] G?kceog¡¦lu AU, Taÿðþ‰D N.Renal scarring in children with febrile urinary tract infection[J].J Pediatr (Rio J), 2025, 101(3):370-374.DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2024.10.011.
[6] ÖлªÒ½Ñ§»áС¶ùÍâ¿ÆÑ§·Ö»áС¶ùÃÚÄòÍâ¿ÆÑ§×é.¶ùͯԷ¢ÐÔ¹£×èÐÔ¾ÞÊäÄò¹ÜÖ¢ÕïÁÆ×¨¼Ò¹²Ê¶[J].ÖлªÐ¡¶ùÍâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾, 2022, 43(8):679-684.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20220402-00233. Group of Urology, Society of Pediatric Surgery, Chinese Medical Association.Expert Consensus on Diagnosing and Treating Primary Obstructed Megaureters in Children[J].Chin J Pediatr Surg, 2022, 43(8):679-684.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20220402-00233.
[7] Jude E, Deshpande A, Barker A, et al.Intravesical ureteric reimplantation for primary obstructed megaureter in infants under 1 year of age[J].J Pediatr Urol, 2017, 13(1):47.e1-47.e7.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.09.009.
[8] Cui X, Huang WH, Wang YJ, et al.Effect of pneumovesicoscopic cohen surgery with adjustable suspension technique through the urethra on the treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux disease in infants[J].BMC Surg, 2023, 23(1):105.DOI:10.1186/s12893-023-01996-7.
[9] ÁõÓ±, ±ÏÔÊÁ¦.Æø°òë×ÊäÄò¹ÜÔÙÖ²ÊõÖÎÁÆÓ¤¶ùÊäÄò¹Ü°òë×Á¬½Ó²¿¹£×èÁÙ´²·ÖÎö[J].ÁÙ´²Ð¡¶ùÍâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾, 2014, 13(4):287-290.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2014.04.007. Liu Y, Bi YL.Clinical analysis of pneumovesicoscopy ureteral reimplantation in treating infantile vesicoureteral junction obstruction[J].J Clin Ped Sur, 2014, 13(4):287-290.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2014.04.007.
[10] Mattioli G, Lena F, Fiorenza V, et al.Robotic ureteral reimplantation and uretero-ureterostomy treating the ureterovesical junction pathologies in children: technical considerations and preliminary results[J].J Robot Surg, 2023, 17(2):659-667.DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01478-7.
[11] Brown CT, Jayanthi VR.Percutaneous vesicoscopic approach for retrograde ureteroscopy following Cohen cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation[J].Urology, 2018, 111:186-188.DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.028.
[12] Lyon RP, Marshall S, Tanagho EA.The ureteral orifice: its configuration and competency[J].J Urol, 1969, 102(4):504-509.DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)62184-0.
[13] Àî°®Îä, ´Þк£, Íõ½¡, µÈ.¸¹Ç»¾µÆø°òë׸ÄÁ¼ÈéͷʽÊäÄò¹Ü°òë×ÔÙÖ²ÊõµÄÁÙ´²Ñо¿[J].ÖлªÐ¡¶ùÍâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾, 2020, 41(2): 112-117.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2020.02.004. Li AW, Cui XH, Wang J, et al.Clinical trials of pneumovesicoscopic modified orthotopic nipple ureteral reimplantation[J].Chin J Pediatr Surg, 2020, 41(2): 112-117.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2020.02.004.
[14] º«ÎÄÎÄ, ÕÅΫƽ, ËïÄþ, µÈ.CohenÔÙÖ²Êõºó·´Á÷Ó°ÏìÒòËØµÄÑо¿[J].ÖлªÐ¡¶ùÍâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾, 2016, 37(11): 846-850.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2016.11.010. Han WW, Zhang WP, Sun N, et al.Retrospective analysis of influencing factors of postoperative reflux after Cohen¡¯s reimplantation[J].Chin J Pediatr Surg, 2016, 37(11):846-850.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2016.11.010.
Memo
ÊÕ¸åÈÕÆÚ:2025-10-30¡£
»ù½ðÏîÄ¿:ɽ¶«Ê¡Æë³ҽѧԺ·¢Õ¹»ù½ð(34641390220001)
ͨѶ×÷Õß:Àî°®Îä,Email:liaiwu@qiluhospital.com