Yu Zhongjing,Lin Zhenying,Li Huanyuan,et al.Clinical efficacies of 1.1 mm endoscopic technique for hydrocele and inguinal hernia in children[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(06):584-588.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202401014-014]
经脐单孔1.1毫米腹腔镜手术治疗小儿鞘膜积液及腹股沟斜疝的对比研究
- Title:
- Clinical efficacies of 1.1 mm endoscopic technique for hydrocele and inguinal hernia in children
- Keywords:
- Testicular Hydrocele; Hernia; Inguinal; Laparoscopy; Treatment Outcome; Comparative Study; Child
- 摘要:
- 目的 探讨经脐单孔直径1.1 mm腹腔镜手术治疗小儿鞘膜积液或腹股沟斜疝的疗效及优缺点。 方法 回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年8月深圳市宝安区妇幼保健院采用1.1 mm腹腔镜(STORZ 0°膀胱镜镜管,型号:27033AA)及自制穿刺器实施手术治疗的30例小儿鞘膜积液或腹股沟斜疝患儿临床资料及随访信息。根据切口大小及戳卡数量进行分组,采取脐部单个1.8 mm切口者为A组(n=30),脐部单个3.3 mm切口者为B组(n=30),脐部两个3.3 mm切口者为C组(n=80)。对比分析三组患儿性别、年龄、发病时间、病种、病变部位、手术时间(包括单侧手术时间及双侧手术时间)的差异。 结果 A组平均手术年龄2.57岁,平均随访时间5.22个月;B组平均手术年龄3.81岁,平均随访时间6.70个月;C组平均手术年龄2.81岁,平均随访时间6.38个月。三组术后均无一例复发、医源性隐睾、切口感染及阴囊水肿发生,C组有1例术后出现腹股沟区切口肉芽肿(1/80)。三组在性别、病种、单侧及双侧情况、手术时长、发病时长上比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。三组患儿年龄及单侧手术时长的差异具有统计学意义(P值分别为0.030和0.039),组间两两比较显示,A、C组患儿平均年龄小于B组(A组比B组,P=0.012;C组比B组,P=0.024),A、C组患儿单侧手术时间多于B组(A组比B组,P=0.045;C组比B组,P=0.015)。 结论 经脐单孔1.1 mm腹腔镜对比经脐单孔3 mm腹腔镜及经脐双孔3 mm腹腔镜治疗小儿鞘膜积液或腹股沟斜疝,疗效相当,术后并发症无增加,手术安全可靠,具有切口更小、更微创,术后瘢痕更小、更美观等优点;但目前开展病例数较少,仍需经验积累和器械升级改造等。
- Abstract:
- Objective To explore the efficacy,advantages and disadvantages of treating pediatric hydrocele/inguinal hernia with a 1.1 mm diameter transumbilical single-port laparoscopy.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted for the clinical data and follow-up findings of 30 children with hydrocele/inguinal hernia from January 2022 to August 2023.A STORZ 1.1 mm laparoscope was applied with a homemade Trocar.Based upon the size of incision and the number of puncture holes,they were assigned into three groups of A (a single 1.8 mm umbilical incision,n=30),B (a single 3.3 mm umbilical incision,n=30) and C (double 3.3 mm umbilical incisions,n=80).The differences in gender,onset time,age,disease type,lesion site and operative duration (unilateral/bilateral) were compared among three groups.Results In group A,the average operative age was 2.57 years with an average follow-up duration of 5.22 months.In group B,the average age was 3.81 years with an average follow-up duration of 6.70 months.In Group C,the average age was 2.81 years with an average follow-up duration of 6.38 months.None of them exhibited such postoperative complications as recurrence,iatrogenic cryptorchidism,incision infection or scrotal edema.However,one case (1/80) in group C developed postoperative granuloma at inguinal incision site.No statistically significant difference existed among three groups in terms of gender,type of disease,differences in unilateral/bilateral conditions before and during surgery,operative duration or duration of illness.However,the difference in average age and unilateral operative duration was statistically significant among three groups (P=0.030 and P=0.039).Average age of group A/C was lower than that in group B (P=0.012 and P=0.024).Unilateral operative duration was longer in group A/C than that in group B (P=0.045 and P=0.015).Conclusions As compared to 3 mm single-umbilical-port laparoscopy and 3 mm dual-umbilical-port laparoscopy,1.1 mm single-umbilical-port laparoscopy for pediatric hydrocele/inguinal hernia has demonstrated consistent surgical outcomes with no increase in postoperative complications.It is a safe and reliable surgery with mini-invasive scars.However,due to a limited number of cases,further experiences and equipment upgrades are required.
参考文献/References:
[1] 蔡威,孙宁,魏光辉.小儿外科学[M].第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014. Cai W,Sun N,Wei GH.Pediatric Surgery[M].Edition V.Beijing:People’s Medical Publishing House,2014.
[2] Panabokke G,Clifford ID,Craig SS,et al.Reduction of paediatric inguinal hernias[J].Emerg Med Australas,2016,28(2):224-227.DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.12549.
[3] Yeap E,Pacilli M,Nataraja RM.Inguinal hernias in children[J].Aust J Gen Pract,2020,49(1/2):38-43.DOI:10.31128/AJGP-08-19-5037.
[4] O’Brien L,Hannan E,Hassett S.Laparoscopic paediatric inguinal hernia repair:lessons learned from 102 cases[J].Ir J Med Sci,2023,192(1):321-326.DOI:10.1007/s11845-022-02975-2.
[5] Esposito C,Montinaro L,Alicchio F,et al.Technical standardization of laparoscopic herniorraphy in pediatric patients[J].World J Surg,2009,33(9):1846-1850.DOI:10.1007/s00268-009-0121-4.
[6] Zhang L,Zhang R,Zhang JF,et al.To use a simple hernia needle for single-port laparoscopic percutaneous inguinal hernia repair in children:a 5-year experience study[J].Front Pediatr,2024,11:1298643.DOI:10.3389/fped.2023.1298643.
[7] 谷奇,李龙,叶辉,等.经脐单孔腹腔镜内环口结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟疝及鞘膜积液的探讨[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2013,12(3):194-195.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2013.03.009. Gu Q,Li L,Ye H,et al.Single-port laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia and hydrocele in children[J].DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2013.03.009.
[8] 张丰年,李炳,陈卫兵,等.经脐单部位腹腔镜下应用注射器行疝囊高位结扎术42例[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2018,17(1):51-53.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2018.01.013. Zhang FN,Li B,Chen WB,et al.High-ligation of hernia sac with syringe under transumbilical single-site laparoscopy for inguinal hernia:a report of 42 cases[J].J Clin Ped Sur,2018,17(1):51-53.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2018.01.013.
[9] Zhang HX,Feng Y,Wang JG,et al.Comparison of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal internal ring closure by two-hook hernia needle and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2023,33(8):821-828.DOI:10.1089/lap.2022.0529.
[10] Nakashima M,Ide K,Kawakami K.Laparoscopic versus open repair for inguinal hernia in children:a retrospective cohort study[J].Surg Today,2019,49(12):1044-1050.DOI:10.1007/s00595-019-01847-0.
[11] Elhaddad A,Awad M,Shehata SM,et al.Laparoscopic management of infantile hydrocele in pediatric age group[J].Pediatr Surg Int,2022,38(4):581-587.DOI:10.1007/s00383-022-05064-8.
[12] 蔡志明,吴文华,罗健,等.针式腹腔镜治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的临床应用[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2000,21(2):101-102.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2000.02.013. Cai ZM,Wu WH,Luo J,et al.Clinical application of needle-type laparoscopic herniotomy for inguinal hernia in children[J].Chin J Pediatr Surg,2000,21(2):101-102.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2000.02.013.
[13] Turial S,Saied A,Schier F.Microlaparoscopic hernia repair in children:initial experiences[J].Surg Innov,2011,18(4):368-372.DOI:10.1177/1553350611406742.
相似文献/References:
[1]王勇,汤绍涛,毛永忠,等.腔镜下手术治疗小儿膈肌疾病31例[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2010,9(06):441.
[2]寿铁军李勇马能强龚晟.腹腔镜手术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝1582例[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2011,10(01):0.
[3]朱琳琳吕志葆陈 功肖现民.腹腔镜下U型缝合膈肌缺损治疗儿童先天性胸骨后疝[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2010,9(03):0.
ZHU Lin-lin,LV Zhi-bao,CHEN Gong,et al.Laparoscopic-assisted full-thickness anterior abdominal wall repair of Morgagni hernia in children.[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2010,9(06):0.
[4].小儿先天性腰疝治疗分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2010,9(04):0.
GUO Zheng-tuan,XU Quan,LI Peng,et al.Diagnosis and management of congenital lumbar hernias in children.[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2010,9(06):0.
[5]唐志贤,余家康,王凤华,等.地塞米松对先天性膈疝胎鼠肺发育的影响[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(01):8.
[6]浦征宇,潘永康,段光琦,等.小儿腹股沟嵌顿性斜疝合并阑尾炎的临床分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(01):37.
[7]葛午平,俞钢,朱小春,等.新生儿小型脐膨出的产前诊断与手法复位治疗[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(04):0.
[8]杜宝峰,易军,刘继炎,等.腹腔镜治疗复发性斜疝58例[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(04):0.
[9]王剑锋,刘国庆,唐华建,等.腹腔镜下网片修补小儿巨大腹股沟斜疝的初步报告[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2007,6(01):31.
[10]唐剑平,何东北,唐向东,等.腹腔镜下小儿腹股沟斜疝高位结扎术45例[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2007,6(01):24.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2024-01-05。
通信作者:张宝欣,Email:1305832155@qq.com