Du Zhen,Wei Siwei,Xiang Zhen,et al.Comparison of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reducing respiratory complications after extubation in children with adenotonsillectomy[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2022,21(06):546-550.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202205041-009]
舒更葡糖钠和新斯的明减少腺样体扁桃体切除术儿童拔管后早期呼吸道并发症的对比研究
- Title:
- Comparison of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reducing respiratory complications after extubation in children with adenotonsillectomy
- Keywords:
- Sugammadex; Adenoidectomy; Tonsillectomy; Rocuronium; Airway Obstruction; Hypoxemia
- 摘要:
- 目的 评价舒更葡糖钠降低腺样体扁桃体切除术儿童拔管后早期呼吸道并发症发生率的效果。方法 选择2019年12月至2020年2月湖南省儿童医院行腺样体和（或）扁桃体切除术的患儿90例作为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将90例患儿分为新斯的明组（N组）和舒更葡糖钠组（S组），每组45例。两组均于麻醉诱导后开始监测患儿神经肌肉功能。静脉注射罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg。术毕，当四个成串刺激（Train-of-Four，TOF） T2出现时，N组注射新斯的明0.02 mg/kg和阿托品0.01 mg/kg；S组注射舒更葡糖钠2 mg/kg。记录神经肌肉阻滞恢复时间、拔管时间和拔管后麻醉恢复室（post anesthesia care unit，PACU）停留时间。观察并记录拔管后早期呼吸道并发症，包括气道梗阻、低氧血症、呼吸暂停、喉痉挛、支气管痉挛、咳嗽和恶心呕吐的发生情况。结果 肌松拮抗后，N组和S组的神经肌肉阻滞恢复时间分别为（2.8±0.7） min和（1.7±0.4） min （P=0.03）。N组拔管时间为（29.5±4.4） min，拔管后PACU停留时间为（9.2±4.0） min。S组拔管时间为（20.1±3.6） min，拔管后PACU停留时间为（5.0±2.2） min。和N组相比，S组拔管时间（P<0.001）和拔管后PACU停留时间（P=0.01）均明显缩短。S组有4例（4/45，8.9%）拔管早期出现气道梗阻，7例（7/45，15.6%）出现低氧血症，1例（1/45，2.2%）出现支气管痉挛；C组拔管早期出现气道梗阻10例（10/45，22.2%），低氧血症16例（16/45，35.6%），支气管痉挛5例（5/45，11.1%），差异均有统计学意义（P均<0.05）。结论 与新斯的明相比，腺样体扁桃体切除术患儿使用舒更葡糖钠拮抗罗库溴铵，不仅能缩短拔管时间和拔管后PACU停留时间，还能降低拔管后早期气道梗阻、低氧血症和支气管痉挛的发生率。
- Abstract:
- Objective To evaluate the effect of sugammadex on reducing the incidence of respiratory complications immediately after extubation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.Methods A total of 90 children with adenoidectomy and/or tonsillectomy were randomly divided into neostigmine + atropine group (N) and sugammadex group (S) (n=45 each).Neuromuscular functions were monitored after anesthesia induction.Rocuronium of 0.6 mg/kg was injected intravenously.When T2 of TOF appeared, group N received an injection of 0.02 mg/kg neostigmin+0.01 mg/kg atropine at the end of operation; Group S had sugammadex 2 mg/kg.Neuromuscular block (NMB) recovery time, extubation time and post anesthesia care unit (PACU) retention time were recorded along with respiratory complications of airway obstruction, hypoxemia, apnea, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, cough, nausea and vomiting.Results After muscle relaxation antagonism, recovery time of NMB was longer in group N than that in group S[(2.8±0.7) vs.(1.7±0.4) min, P<0.001].Compared with group N, extubation time[(29.5±4.4) vs.(20.1±3.6) min, P<0.001]and PACU retention time[(9.2±4.0) vs.(5.0±2.2), P=0.01]were significantly shorter in group S.In group S, 4 children (9%) were fewer than 10 children (22%) in group N with airway obstruction immediately after extubation (P=0.03), 7 children (16%) fewer than 16 children (35%) in group N with hypoxemia (P=0.04) and 1 child (2%) fewer than 5 children (11%) in group N with bronchospasm (P=0.04).Conclusion Compared with neostigmine, use of sugammadex for rocuronium antagonism can not only shorten postoperative extubation time and PACU retention time, but also lower the incidence of airway obstruction, hypoxemia and bronchospasm immediately after extubation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.
参考文献/References:
[1] De Luca Canto G, Pachêco-Pereira C, Aydinoz S, et al.Adenotonsillectomy Complications:A Meta-analysis[J].Pediatrics, 2015, 136(4):702-718.DOI:10.1542/peds.2015-1283.
[2] 刘礼霞, 沈碧霞, 张诗海.小儿应用非去极化肌松药后残余肌松的研究状况[J].临床小儿外科杂志, 2006, 5(6):450-452, 462.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2006.06.016.Liu LX, Shen BX, Zhang SH.Research status of remainder muscles blockade after application of non-depolarized musccular relaxant[J].J Clin Ped Sur, 2006, 5(6):450-452, 462.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2006.06.016.
[3] Martins RO, Castello-Branco N, Barros JL, et al.Risk factors for respiratory complications after adenotonsillectomy in children with obstructive sleep apnea[J].J Bras Pneumol, 2015, 41(3):238-245.DOI:10.1590/S1806-37132015000004415.
[4] Sparr HJ, Vermeyen KM, Beaufort AM, et al.Early reversal of profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex in a randomized multicenter study:efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics[J].Anesthesiology, 2007, 106(5):935-943.DOI:10.1097/01.anes.0000265152.78943.74.
[5] Bom A, Hope F, Rutherford S, et al.Preclinical pharmacology of sugammadex[J].J Crit Care, 2009, 24(1):29-35.DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.10.010.
[6] Plaud B, Meretoja O, Hofmockel R, et al.Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex in pediatric and adult surgical patients[J].Anesthesiology, 2009, 110(2):284-294.DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e318194caaa.
[7] Matsui M, Konishi J, Suzuki T, et al.Reversibility of rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular block with sugammadex in infants and children-a randomized study[J].sxx 42(10):1637-1640.DOI:10.1248/bpb.b19-00044.
[8] Korkmaz MO, Sayhan H, Guven M.Does sugammadex decrease the severity of agitation and complications in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy?[J].Saudi Med J, 2019, 40(9):907-913.DOI:10.15537/smj.2019.9.24485.
[9] Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration:Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures:An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration[J].Anesthesiology, 2017, 126(3):376-393.DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452.
[10] Baijal RG, Bidani SA, Minard CG, et al.Perioperative respiratory complications following awake and deep extubation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy[J].10.1111/pan.12561.
[11] Ammar AS, Mahmoud KM, Kasemy ZA.A comparison of sugammadex and neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in children[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2017, 61(4):374-380.DOI:10.1111/aas.12868.
[12] Aytac I, Postaci A, Aytac B, et al.Survey of postoperative residual curarization, acute respiratory events and approach of anesthesiologists[J].Braz J Anesthesiol, 2016, 66(1):55-62.DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2012.06.011.
[13] Pieters BJ, Penn E, Nicklaus P, et al.Emergence delirium and postoperative pain in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy:a comparison of propofol vs sevoflurane anesthesia[J].Paediatr Anaesth, 2010, 20(10):944-950.DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03394.x.
[14] Meretoja OA.Neuromuscular block and current treatment strategies for its reversal in children[J].Paediatr Anaesth, 2010, 20(7):591-604.DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03335.x.
[15] Eleveld DJ, Kuizenga K, Proost JH, et al.A temporary decrease in twitch response during reversal of rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation with a small dose of sugammadex[J].Anesth Analg, 2007, 104(3):582-584.DOI:10.1213/01.ane.0000250617.79166.7f.
[16] Gulec E, Biricik E, Turktan M, et al.The effect of intravenous dexamethasone on sugammadex reversal time in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy[J].Anesth Analg, 2016, 122(4):1147-1152.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001142.
[17] Tobias JD.Current evidence for the use of sugammadex in children[J].Paediatr Anaesth, 2017, 27(2):118-125.DOI:10.1111/pan.13050.
[18] Sanders JC, King MA, Mitchell RB, et al.Perioperative complications of adenotonsillectomy in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome[J].Anesth Analg, 2006, 103(5):1115-1121.DOI:10.1213/01.ane.0000244318.77377.67.
[19] Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, et al.Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy:Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS?) Society recommendations[J].Br J Surg, 2014, 101(10):1209-1229.DOI:10.1002/bjs.9582.
相似文献/References:
[1]徐华,赵陶丽.瑞芬太尼对小儿等离子刀扁桃体腺样体切除术应激反应的影响[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2010,9(06):468.
[2]凌科技,肖旭平,冯晓辉,等.鼻内镜下腺样体吸切术与常规腺样体刮除术疗效分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(02):19.
[3]凌科技 冯晓辉. 腺样体肥大低温等离子消融术与经鼻内镜腺样体吸切术疗效分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2013,12(06):465.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-02-10。
基金项目:湖南省自然科学基金（S2019JJQNJJ0583）
通讯作者:屈双权,Email:qushuangquan1974@163.com