Hu Yaoqin,Qiu Jinpeng,Zhao Jialian,et al.Effects of different anesthetic modes upon children with concealed penis[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2020,19(08):728-733.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2020.08.013]
不同麻醉方式对隐匿阴茎手术麻醉效果的对比研究
- Title:
- Effects of different anesthetic modes upon children with concealed penis
- Keywords:
- Penis/SU; Anesthesia; Intravenous; Anesthesia; General; Anesthesia; Epidural
- 分类号:
- R697+.1;R614.2+1;R614.2+4;R614.4+2
- 摘要:
- 目的 探讨不同麻醉方式在隐匿阴茎手术中的麻醉镇痛效果。方法 本研究共收集浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院行隐匿阴茎手术患儿90例作为研究对象，随机分为3组，即静脉麻醉复合罗哌卡因利多卡因骶管阻滞组（Ⅰ组）、静脉麻醉复合罗哌卡因骶管阻滞组（Ⅱ组）、喉罩插管全麻复合罗哌卡因骶管阻滞组（Ⅲ组）。监测术中生命体征，记录麻醉诱导至手术开始时间，运动阻滞评分、PACU停留时间、术后各时点疼痛评分、术后镇痛药给药次数、麻醉费用等。结果 3组患儿均按术前制定的麻醉方案进行，麻醉效果满意，术中生命体征平稳。麻醉诱导至手术开始时间3组间无统计学差异（P=0.58）。Ⅰ、Ⅱ组手术完成后患儿送往PACU，Ⅲ组手术完成后拔出喉罩后送往PACU。术中加用丙泊酚人数Ⅰ、Ⅱ组无统计学差异（P=0.573）。Ⅲ组术中采用七氟烷（1%~1.5%）吸入维持。术后PACU停留时间3组间无统计学差异（P=0.458）；术后镇痛药物使用和术后疼痛评分3组间无统计学差异（P>0.05）。相对于Ⅱ、Ⅲ组，Ⅰ组在术后30 min存在运动阻滞（P<0.001）。术后恶心呕吐的发生率3组间无统计学差异（P=0.455），术后Ⅲ组有7例（23.3%）出现苏醒期躁动、3例（10%）出现分泌物增多。结论 静脉麻醉复合罗哌卡因骶管阻滞用于小儿隐匿阴茎手术麻醉效果佳，术后镇痛完善，副作用少，可加快手术室的利用率，加速患儿的术后康复。
- Abstract:
- Objective To explore the effects of different anesthetic modes on anesthetic efficacy during and after operations of concealed penis in children. Methods A total of 90 children undergoing concealed penile surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into intravenous anesthesia plus ropivacaine and lidocaine sacral anesthesia group (group Ⅰ), intravenous anesthesia plus ropivacaine sacral anesthesia group (group Ⅱ) and laryngeal mask anesthesia plus ropivacaine sacral anesthesia group (group Ⅲ). Vital signs in different groups were monitored intraoperatively. Time from induction of anesthesia to beginning of operation, postoperative dosing frequency of analgesics, postoperative pain score at each timepoint, motor blockage score, duration of postanesthesia care unit (PACU), anesthetic cost and hospitalization length were recorded. Results The efficacy of anesthesia was satisfactory in all three groups and the anesthetic protocol remained unchanged during operation. No significant difference existed in time from induction of anesthesia to beginning of operation among three groups (P=0.58). Children in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ were transferred postoperatively into PACU while those in group Ⅲ did so after removing laryngeal mask. Propofol consumed intraoperatively showed no difference between groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (P=0.573). The concentration of sevoflurane was maintained at 1%-1.5% in group Ⅲ. PACU duration, pain score and postoperative use of analgesics showed no difference among three groups. As compared with groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ, group Ⅰ had motor blockage at 30 min post-operation (P<0.001). No difference was observed in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) among three groups (P=0.455). There were delirium (n=7) and intensified excretions (n=3) while no symptom was observed in another two groups. The cost of anesthesia in group Ⅲ nearly doubled of those in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ. No difference existed in hospitalization length among three groups. Conclusion Ropivacaine caudal blockage alone may achieve satisfactory anesthesia during concealed penis surgery, reduce the intubation-related complications, quicken the utilization of operating room and accelerate the postoperative recovery of children.
参考文献/References:
1 Krane EJ,Weisman SJ,Walco GA.The national opioid epidemic and the risk of outpatient opioids in children[J].Pediatrics,2018,142(2):e20181623.DOI:10.1542/peds.2018-1623.
2 Gan TJ.Poorly controlled postoperative pain:prevalence,consequences,and prevention[J].J Pain Res,2017,10:2287-2298.DOI:10.2147/JPR.S144066.
3 Hassan PF,Hassan AS,Elmetwally SA.Caudal analgesia for hypospadias in pediatrics:comparative evaluation of adjuvants dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine combination versus dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine:a prospective,double-blinded,randomized comparative study[J].Anesth Essays Res,2018,12(3):644-650.DOI:10.4103/aer.
4 Suresh S,Ecoffey C,Bosenberg A,et al.The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy/American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Recommendations on Local Anesthetics and Adjuvants Dosage in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2018,43(2):211-216.DOI:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000702.
5 纪淑敏,沈燕平,邹汶航.罗哌卡因联合利多卡因骶管阻滞对小儿腹腔镜斜疝手术的麻醉效果及安全性[J].中国生化药物杂志,2016,36(11):100-102.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-1678.2016.11.029.Ji SM,Shen YP,Zou WH.Efficacy and safety of ropivacaine combined with lidocaine in caudal block for pediatric laparoscopic hernia surgery[J].Chin J Biochem Pharms,2016,36(11):100-102.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-1678.2016.11.029.
6 黄振华,左云霞.利多卡因复合罗哌卡因骶管阻滞用于学龄期青春期男性患儿阴茎手术[J].西部医学,2009,21(6):920-922.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.Huang ZH,Zuo YX.The effect of Lidocaine and Ropivacaine combinations in caudal block for penis operation in school-age and adolescent patients[J].Med J West China,2009,21(6):920-922.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.
7 Mayhew D,Mendonca V,Murthy BVS.A review of ASA physical status-historical perspectives and modern developments[J].Anaesthesia,2019,74(3):373-379.DOI:10.1111/anae.14569.Epub 2019 Jan 15.
8 van Hoff SL,O’Neill ES,Cohen LC,et al.Does a prophylactic dose of propofol reduce emergence agitation in children receiving anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2015,25(7):668-676.DOI:10.1111/pan.12669.
9 Crellin DJ,Harrison D,Santamaria N,et al.The psychometric properties of the FLACC scale used to assess procedural pain[J].Pain,2018,19(8):862-872.DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.013.
10 Katz D,Hamburger J,Gutman D,et al.The effect of adding subarachnoid epinephrine to hyperbaric bupivacaine and morphine for repeat cesarean delivery:a double-blind prospective randomized control trial[J].Anesth Analg,2018,127(1):171-178.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002542.
11 Yoshioka S,Takedatsu H,Fukunaga S,et al.Study to determine guidelines for pediatric colonoscopy[J].World J Gastroentero,2017,23(31):5773-5779.DOI:10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5773.
12 Walker BJ,Long JB,Sathyamoorthy M,et al.Complications in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia:An Analysis of More than 100,000 Blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network[J].Anesthesiology,2018,129(4):721-732.DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000002372.
13 Kendall MC,Alves LJC,Suh EI,et al.Regional anesthesia to ameliorate postoperative analgesia outcomes in pediatric surgical patients:an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J].Local Reg Anesth,2018,11:91-109.DOI:10.2147/LRA.S185554.
14 李杰,张瑞芹.小儿基础麻醉的研究进展[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2018,17(8):631-635.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2018.08.017.Li J,Zhang RQ.Research progress of basic anesthesia for children[J].J Clin Ped Sur,2018,17(8):631-635.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2018.08.017.
15 中华医学会小儿外科学分会心胸外科学组.基于快速康复的小儿外科围手术期气道管理专家共识[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2019,40(7):577-582.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2019.07.001.Expert Group on Perioperative Airway Management in Pediatric Surgery.Expert Consensus on Perioperative Airway Management Based on Enhanced Recovery after Pediatric Surgery[J].Chin J Pediatr Surg,2019,40(7):577-582.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2019.07.001.
16 von Ungern-Sternberg BS,Boda K,Chambers NA,et al.Risk assessment for respiratory complications in paediatric anaesthesia:a prospective cohort study[J].Lancet,2010,376(9743):773-783.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61193-2.
17 Tait AR,Burke C,Voepel-Lewis T,et al.Glycopyrrolate does not reduce the incidence of perioperative adverse events in children with upper respiratory tract infections[J].Anesth Analg,2007,104(2):265-270.DOI:10.1213/01.ane.0000243333.96141.40.
18 Luce V,Harkouk H,Brasher C,et al.Supraglottic airway devices vs tracheal intubation in children:a quantitative meta-analysis of respiratory complications[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2014,24(10):1088-1098.DOI:10.1111/pan.12495.
19 Fang XZ,Gao J,Ge YL,et al.Network Meta-analysis on the efficacy of dexmedetomidine,midazolam,ketamine,propofol,and fentanyl for the prevention of sevoflurane-related emergence agitation in children[J].Am J Ther,2016,23(4):e1032-e1042.DOI:10.1097/MJT.0000000000000321.
20 Cannesson M,Kain Z.Enhanced recovery after surgery versus perioperative surgical home:is it all in the name[J].Anesth Analg,2014,118(5):901-902.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000177.
21 Girsberger SA,Schneider MP,L?ffel LM,et al.Effect of thoracic epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine on lower urinary tract function[J].Anesthesiology,2018,128(3):511-519.DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001980
22 Piper SL,Laron D,Manzano G,et al.A comparison of lidocaine,ropivacaine and dexamethasone toxicity on bovine tenocytes in culture[J].J Bone Joint Surg,2012,94(6):856-862.DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.29063.
相似文献/References:
[1]贾杰,胡祖荣,邓恋,等.瑞芬太尼复合七氟醚在新生儿全身麻醉中的应用[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2010,9(06):464.
[2]欧阳帆,张治明,曾宾,等.七氟醚复合髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞用于小儿腹股沟手术[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2010,9(06):466.
[3]徐华,赵陶丽.瑞芬太尼对小儿等离子刀扁桃体腺样体切除术应激反应的影响[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2010,9(06):468.
[4]张建敏王芳吕红.丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼静脉麻醉在儿童纤维结肠镜检查中的应用[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2011,10(01):0.
[5]刘涌王正坤叶玉萍谢威武建.舒芬太尼和芬太尼用于小儿腹腔镜手术麻醉的比较[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2010,9(03):0.
[6]陈俊杰,郭晓东,孙志南,等.应用带血管蒂包皮内板法治疗重度隐匿型阴茎[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(01):29.
[7]姚玉笙,陈本祯,谭玲,等.不同材质喉罩用于氧化亚氮全麻时囊内压值观察[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(05):1.
[8]康承斌,张安生,黄凌鲲,等.小儿尿道下裂矫形术中不同麻醉方式麻醉效果比较[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(05):1.
[9]周星星,张溪英,屈双权,等.90例新生儿急腹症麻醉处理体会[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(05):1.
[10]郑洪,谭朝华.喉罩下吸入麻醉加骶麻在小儿尿道下裂成形术中的应用[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2007,6(01):17.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-12-24。
基金项目:浙江省自然科学基金（编号：YZOHI00019）
通讯作者:舒强,Email:shuqiang@zju.edu.cn