He Yuzhu,Li Jiayi,Song Hongcheng,et al.Comparative analysis of complications between open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for congenital ureteropelvic junction obstructive hydronephrosis in children[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(04):315-322.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202403060-004]
腹腔镜及开放手术治疗儿童先天性肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻性肾积水的并发症对比
- Title:
- Comparative analysis of complications between open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for congenital ureteropelvic junction obstructive hydronephrosis in children
- Keywords:
- Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction; Laparoscopy; Urologic Surgical Procedures; Hydronephrosis; Intraoperative Complications; Postoperative Complications; Child
- 摘要:
- 目的 比较腹腔镜及开放离断式肾盂成形术治疗儿童先天性肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻(ureteropelvic junction obstruction,UPJO)性肾积水的术中及术后并发症特点,探讨导致两种手术方式并发症差异的影响因素。 方法 回顾性分析2016年7月至2018年12月首次于首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院接受腹腔镜或开放离断式肾盂成形术治疗的美国胎儿泌尿外科协会(Society for Fetal Urology,SFU)分级为Ⅳ级的UPJO肾积水患儿临床资料,共560例患儿583例肾。按照手术方式分为腹腔镜组(355例肾)和开放组(228例肾),对比分析两组并发症发生率、发生次数以及并发症等级和类型。比较不同引流方式、有无术中并发症以及不同年龄、体重、术前肾盂前后径(anteroposterior pelvic diameter,APD)及术者经验分层因素下的并发症差异。 结果 开放组患儿年龄16.37(9.73,61.37)个月,体重11.00(9.32,20.00)kg,明显小于腹腔镜组[年龄46.87(19.08,90.49)个月,体重16.50(12.00,25.00)kg]。开放组术前中位肾盂前后径为39.00(27.00,52.00)mm,长于腹腔镜组的28.00(22.00,36.00)mm,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。腹腔镜组和开放组术中并发症发生率(分别为7.61%和4.39%)、术后并发症发生率(分别为17.15%和15.56%)、术后并发症发生次数占总发生次数比例(分别为23.84%和20.88%)以及吻合口再狭窄发生率(分别为2.62%和1.33%)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。两组最常见的术后并发症均为泌尿系感染。存在术中并发症的肾脏术后更易发生高等级并发症(χ2=5.600,P=0.018)及泌尿系感染(χ2=8.891,P=0.003)。腹腔镜组较开放组更易出现高等级(Clavien Ⅲb)术后并发症(χ2=6.595,P=0.010)和除泌尿系感染以外的其他术后并发症(χ2=10.289,P=0.001)。 结论 腹腔镜和开放离断式肾盂成形术治疗儿童UPJO性肾积水安全有效,两种手术方式的术后并发症发生率无差异。腹腔镜手术较开放手术应更加注意除泌尿系感染以外的其他术后并发症以及高等级术后并发症的发生。
- Abstract:
- Objective To compare the perioperative complications and explore the potential factors contributing to the differences in complications between laparoscopic and open dismembered pyeloplasty for congenital ureteropelvic junction obstructive hydronephrosis in children. Methods Between July 2016 and December 2018,retrospective review was conducted for all children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) undergoing primary transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and retroperitoneal open pyeloplasty (OP) Perioperative complications were compared between LP and OP.Complication rate,Clavien-Dindo grade and types were compared.Complications were also compared between different postoperative drainage modes and groups with or without intraoperative complications.Also the differences in postoperative complications were explored among groups with varying age,weight,anterioposterior pelvic diameter (APD) and surgeon expertise. Results For 583 UPJO kidneys,LP was performed for 355 kidneys and OP for 228 kidneys.The median age of the open group was 16.37 months (9.73 months,61.37 months) and the median weight was 11.00 kg (9.30 kg,20.00 kg), which were significantly lower than the median age of the laparoscopic group,which was 46.87 months (19.08 months,90.49 months),and the median weight of 16.50 kg (12.00 kg,25.00 kg). The median preoperative renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter in the open group was 39.00 mm (27.00 mm,52.00 mm), significantly larger than that of the laparoscopic group,which was 28.00 mm (22.00 mm,36.00 mm).These differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The inter-group incidence of intraoperative complications showed no significant difference (LP:7.61% vs OP:4.39%).Also no significant inter-group difference existed in restenosis of anastomotic rate (LP:2.62% vs.OP:1.33%).Although no significant inter-group difference in the incidence or frequency of postoperative complications,types of complications differed.Urinary tract infections (UTIs) dominated in both groups.Kidneys with intraoperative complications were more prone to higher grades of postoperative complications (χ2=5.600,P=0.018) and UTIs (χ2=8.891,P=0.003).As compared with OP group,LP group showed a higher propensity for high-grade postoperative complications (Clavien Ⅲb) (χ2=6.595,P=0.010) and other complications (χ2=10.289,P=0.001),except for UTIs. Conclusions LP and OP are both safe and effective in UPJO children.However,types of complications differ.As compared with OP,LP requires a higher alert for the occurrence of complications and high-grade postoperative complications,except for UTIs.
参考文献/References:
[1] 杨洋,张潍平,李振武,等.经腹腔途径腹腔镜下离断性肾盂成形术的并发症分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38(1):23-27.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2017.01.006. Yang Y,Zhang WP,Li ZW,et al.Analysis about the complication of transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloureteroplasty[J].Chin J Urol,2017,38(1):23-27.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2017.01.006.
[2] Uhlig A,Uhlig J,Trojan L,et al.Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction-a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J].BMC Urol,2019,19(1):112.DOI:10.1186/s12894-019-0544-7.
[3] Polok M,Borselle D,Toczewski K,et al.Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children:experience of 226 cases at one centre[J].Arch Med Sci,2020,16(4):858-862.DOI:10.5114/aoms.2019.84496.
[4] Aksenov LI,Granberg CF,Gargollo PC.A systematic review of complications of minimally invasive surgery in the pediatric urological literature[J].J Urol,2020,203(5):1010-1016.DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000000707.
[5] Masieri L,Sforza S,Cini C,et al.Minilaparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children less than 1 year[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2019,29(7):970-975.DOI:10.1089/lap.2018.0586.
[6] Simforoosh N,Ansari Djafari A,Shemshaki H,et al.Mini-laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults and children:a high-volume case series[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2019,29(6):747-751.DOI:10.1089/lap.2018.0470.
[7] Vemulakonda VM,Cowan CA,Lendvay TS,et al.Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction:a Pediatric Health Information System database study[J].J Urol,2008,180(4 Suppl):1689-1692.DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.096.
[8] He Y,Song H,Liu P,et al.Primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children:A single-center experience of 279 patients and analysis of possible factors affecting complications[J].J Pediatr Urol,2020,16(3):331.e1-331.e11.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.03.028.
[9] 赵敏利,田广超,苑思彤,等.儿童腹腔镜肾盂成形术并发症的分析及处理[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2020,41(9):813-818.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20200223-00112. Zhao ML,Tian GC,Yuan ST,et al.Analysis and management of complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children[J].Chin J Pediatr Surg,2020,41(9):813-818.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20200223-00112.
[10] Neheman A,Noh PH,Piaggio L,et al.The role of laparoscopic surgery for urinary tract reconstruction in infants weighing less than 10 kg:a comparison with open surgery[J].J Pediatr Urol,2008,4(3):192-196.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.11.012.
[11] Chan YY,Durbin-Johnson B,Sturm RM,et al.Outcomes after pediatric open,laparoscopic,and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions[J].J Pediatr Urol,2017,13(1):49.e1-49.e6.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.08.029.
[12] Simforoosh N,Abedi A,Hosseini Sharifi SH,et al.Comparison of surgical outcomes and cosmetic results between standard and mini laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children younger than 1 year of age[J].J Pediatr Urol,2014,10(5):819-823.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.026.
[13] Paraboschi I,Jannello L,Mantica G,et al.Outcomes and costs analysis of Externalized PyeloUreteral versus internal Double-J ureteral stents after paediatric laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty[J].J Pediatr Urol,2020,17(2):232.e1-232.e7.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.006.
[14] 黄一天,杨猛,温晟,等.儿童肾盂输尿管成形术后不同引流方式的疗效对比[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(3):247-252.DOI:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.03.009. Huang YT,Yang M,Wen S,et al.Comparison of different drainage methods after ureteroplasty in children[J].J Clin Ped Sur,2021,20(3):247-252.DOI:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.03.009.
[15] Chu DI,Shrivastava D,Van Batavia JP,et al.Outcomes of externalized pyeloureteral versus internal ureteral stent in pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty[J].J Pediatr Urol,2018,14(5):450.e1-450.e6.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.012.
[16] Badawy H,Zoaier A,Ghoneim T,et al.Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children:Randomized clinical trial[J].J Pediatr Urol,2015,11(3):122.e1-122.e6.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.019.
[17] Abou-Haidar H,Al-Qaoud T,Jednak R,et al.Laparoscopic pyeloplasty:Initial experience with 3D vision laparoscopy and articulating shears[J].J Pediatr Urol,2016,12(6):426.e1-426.e5.DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.08.027.
相似文献/References:
[1]郑凯,胡敏.腹腔镜在小儿肠套叠复位术中的应用[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(01):16.
[2]宋连杰,李贵斌,李龙,等.腹腔镜在睾丸未触及诊断治疗中的应用[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2008,7(03):27.
[3]田琪 董亮 王晓晔 崔华雷. 腹腔镜在小儿卵巢良性畸胎瘤手术中的应用[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2011,10(04):258.
[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2011,10(04):258.
[4]于增文 李索林 李英超 徐伟立 时保军. 腹腔镜脾切除联合胃食管周围血管离断术治疗小儿门静脉高压症[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2011,10(04):267.
[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2011,10(04):267.
[5]张振强高群黄河陈晨张燕敏赛恺. 儿童阑尾脓肿的腹腔镜治疗[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2011,10(04):286.
[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2011,10(04):286.
[6]杨全安 邓素勤. 小儿急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜手术治疗[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2011,10(04):310.
[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2011,10(04):310.
[7]戴康临 陶强 陈快 陶俊峰 樊伟 雷俊 黄金狮. 新生儿腹腔镜下胆总管囊肿根治术体会[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2011,10(04):316.
[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2011,10(04):316.
[8]黄河 戚士芹 高群 陈晨 卢贤映 未德成. 腹腔镜辅助改良Soave术根治小儿先天性巨结肠[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2012,11(02):112.
[9]桂容花 彭旭 周福金 曲朝晖 张媛 马海峰. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗儿童坏疽性阑尾炎的比较[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2012,11(02):120.
[10]张友波 郑志刚 李聪 潘东山. 经脐单孔腹腔镜辅助美克尔憩室切除术12例[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2012,11(05):362.
[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2012,11(04):362.
[11]杨平,李康明,邹兵,等.机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻的Meta分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2022,21(05):482.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202011015-015]
Yang Ping,Li Kangming,Zou Bing,et al.Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction:Meta-analysis of comparative studies[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2022,21(04):482.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202011015-015]
[12]汪添益,张宇,付明翠,等.儿童肾盂成形术后严重尿外渗的临床特点及预后分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2024,(04):323.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202403060-005]
Wang Tianyi,Zhang Yu,Fu Mingcui,et al.Massive urinary extravasation after pyeloplasty in children:clinical features and prognoses[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(04):323.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202403060-005]
[13]李虎,潮敏,蒋加斌,等.腹腔镜肾盂成形术后非计划再手术的危险因素分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2024,(04):328.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202403060-006]
Li Hu,Chao Min,Jiang Jiabin,et al.Analysis of risk factors of unplanned reoperation after laparoscopic pyeloplasty[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(04):328.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202403060-006]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-12-27。
基金项目:北京市科委、中关村管委会"医药创新品种及平台培育"专项资助(Z231100004823034)
通讯作者:张潍平,Email:zhangwpp@163.com