Zhang Di,Ge Ming,Ma Wenping,et al.A comparison of π craniectomy plus orthopedic helmet versus cranial vault remodeling for non-syndromic premature sagittal suture in infants[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(02):113-118.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312054-003]
π型截骨术后辅助头盔治疗与颅骨重建术治疗婴幼儿非综合征型矢状缝早闭的疗效比较
- Title:
- A comparison of π craniectomy plus orthopedic helmet versus cranial vault remodeling for non-syndromic premature sagittal suture in infants
- Keywords:
- Craniosynostoses; Sagittal Synostosis; Surgical Procedures; Operative; Craniectomy; Treatment Outcome; Infant; Child
- 摘要:
- 目的 对比π型截骨术后辅助头盔治疗与颅骨重建术治疗婴幼儿非综合征型矢状缝早闭的围手术期风险因素及术后疗效,探讨两种治疗方法的优劣,为婴幼儿非综合征型矢状缝早闭个体化治疗方案的选择提供参考。方法 回顾性分析2018年5月至2023年5月首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院神经外科收治的非综合征型矢状缝早闭婴幼儿临床资料,根据治疗方法分为π型截骨术后辅助头盔治疗组和颅骨重建术治疗组,对两组患儿围手术期数据以及术前、术后随访期间头颅指数和颅腔容积进行统计学分析。结果 π型截骨术后辅助头盔治疗组11例,男8例、女3例;颅骨重建术组6例,男4例、女2例。π型截骨术后辅助头盔治疗组与颅骨重建术治疗组患儿术前、术后随访期间头颅指数以及术前颅腔容积分别为:术前头颅指数(0.72±0.06)比(0.67±0.04),术后随访期间头颅指数(0.77±0.06)比(0.73±0.01),术前颅腔容积(753.54±94.25)mL比(812.02±79.89)mL,以上差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。而年龄［(8.23±2.10)个月比(14.57±5.54)个月］、手术时长［(2.24±0.22)h比(5.00±0.52)h］、术中出血量［(70.0(57.5,122.5)mL比120.0(100.0,127.5)mL］、住院费用［31 355.0(27 595.0,37 554.0)元比116 414.5(98 185.3,124 383.5)元］以及术后随访颅腔容积［(823.72±93.94)mL比(956.54±149.31)mL］比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 π型截骨术后辅助头盔治疗和颅骨重建术治疗婴幼儿非综合征型矢状缝早闭,均能改善患儿头颅指数和颅腔容积;π型截骨术后辅助头盔治疗手术时间短、术中出血少、治疗费用低,而颅骨重建术对于患儿术后颅腔容积的扩大更具优势。
- Abstract:
- Objective To compare the perioperative risk factors and postoperative efficacy of πcraniectomy plus orthopedic helmet versus cranial vault remodeling for non-syndromic premature sagittal suture and examine the advantages and disadvantages of two treatments to provide references for formulating individualized treatment plans for infantile non-syndromic sagittal premature closure.Methods From May 2018 to May 2023,retrospective review was conducted for hospitalized infants with non-syndromic sagittal premature closure.Perioperative data,perioperative cephalic index and intracranial volume were statistically examined.T test was utilized for normal distribution data and Mann-Whitney test for non-normal distribution data.P<0.05 implied statistically significant inter-group difference.Results There were 11 children (8 boys,3 girls) in π craniectomy plus orthopedic helmet group.Cranial vault remodeling group included 6 children (4 boys,2 girls).No significant inter-group difference existed in pericephalic index or preoperative intracranial volume (P>0.05).Preoperative cephalic index ［(0.72±0.06) vs.(0.67±0.04)］,postoperative cephalic index ［(0.77±0.06) vs.(0.73±0.01)］and preoperative intracranial volume ［(753.54±94.25) vs.(812.02±79.89) ml］.However,differences of statistical significance existed in age ［(8.23±2.10) vs.(14.57±5.54) month］,operation duration［(2.24±0.22) vs.(5.00±0.52) h］,intraoperative volume of blood loss ［(70.0(57.5,122.5) vs.120.0(100.0,127.5) mL］,hospitalization expense ［31355.0(27595.0,37554.0) vs.116414.5(98185.3,124383.5) yuan］and postoperative follow-up intracranial volume ［(823.72±93.94) vs.956.54±149.31) mL］(P<0.05).Conclusions Both πcraniectomy plus orthopedic helmet and cranial vault remodeling may improve intracranial volume and cephalic index of infants with non-syndromic premature sagittal suture.However,π craniectomy plus orthopedic helmet offers the advantages of shorter operative duration,less intraoperative volume of hemorrhage and lower hospitalization expense.Cranial vault remodeling is reserved for postoperative expansion of intracranial volume.
参考文献/References:
[1] Burokas L.Craniosynostosis:caring for infants and their families[J].Crit Care Nurse,2013,33(4):39-50.DOI:10.4037/ccn2013678.
[2] Proctor MR,Meara JG.A review of the management of single-suture craniosynostosis,past,present and future[J].J Neurosurg Pediatr,2019,24(6):622-631.DOI:10.3171/2019.7.PEDS18585.
[3] Garber ST,Karsy M,Kestle JRW,et al.Comparing outcomes and cost of 3 surgical treatments for sagittal synostosis:a retrospective study including procedure-related cost analysis[J].Neurosurgery,2017,81(4):680-687.DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyx209.
[4] Wall SA,Thomas GPL,Johnson D,et al.The preoperative incidence of raised intracranial pressure in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis is underestimated in the literature[J].J Neurosurg Pediatr,2014,14(6):674-681.DOI:10.3171/2014.8.PEDS1425.
[5] David LR,Proffer P,Hurst WJ,et al.Spring-mediated cranial reshaping for craniosynostosis[J].J Craniofac Surg,2004,15(5):810-816.DOI:10.1097/00001665-200409000-00021.
[6] Magge SN,Bartolozzi AR,Almeida ND,et al.A comparison of endoscopic strip craniectomy and pi craniectomy for treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis[J].J Neurosurg Pediatr,2019,23(6):708-714.DOI:10.3171/2019.1.PEDS18203.
[7] Jimenez DF,Barone CM.Early treatment of coronal synostosis with endoscopy-assisted craniectomy and postoperative cranial orthosis therapy:16-year experience[J].J Neurosurg Pediatr,2013,12(3):207-219.DOI:10.3171/2013.4.PEDS11191.
[8] Jane JA,Edgerton MT,Futrell JW,et al.Immediate correction of sagittal synostosis[J].J Neurosurg,1987,49(5):705-710.DOI:10.3171/jns.1978.49.5.0705.
[9] Friede H,Lauritzen C,Figueroa AA.Roentgencephalometric follow-up after early osteotomies in patients with scaphocephaly[J].J Craniofac Surg,1996,7(2):96-101.DOI:10.1097/00001665-199603000-00002.
[10] Raposo-Amaral CE,Denadai R,Takata JPI,et al.Progressive frontal morphology changes during the first year of a modified Pi procedure for scaphocephaly[J].Childs Nerv Syst,2016,32(2):337-344.DOI:10.1007/s00381-015-2914-0.
[11] 中国儿童颅缝早闭症诊治协作组.儿童颅缝早闭症诊治专家共识[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2021,42(9):769-773.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20210208-00069.Collaborative Group of Diagnosing & Treating Craniosynostosis in Chinese Children:Expert Consensus on Diagnosing and Treating Craniosynostosis in Children[J].Chin J Pediatr Surg,2021,42(9):769-773.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20210208-00069.
[12] 张迪,葛明,李大鹏,等.π形截骨术联合矫形头盔治疗婴儿矢状缝早闭[J].中华整形外科杂志,2023,39(1):47-53.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20211228-00486.Zhang D,Ge M,Li DP,et al.πcraniectomy plus orthopedic helmet for treating infantile sagittal synostosis[J].Chin J Plast Surg,2023,39(1):47-53.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20211228-00486.
[13] Tessier P.The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis.Crouzon’s and Apert’s diseases[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,1971,48(5):419-442.DOI:10.1097/00006534-197111000-00002.
[14] Hashim PW,Patel A,Yang JF,et al.The effects of whole-vault cranioplasty versus strip craniectomy on long-term neuropsychological outcomes in sagittal craniosynostosis[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2014,134(3):491-501.DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000420.
[15] Greensmith AL,Holmes AD,Lo P,et al.Complete correction of severe scaphocephaly:the Melbourne method of total vault remodeling[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2008,121(4):1300-1310.DOI:10.1097/01.prs.0000304592.56498.d6.
相似文献/References:
[1]伍添,吴水华.NFIA基因突变致脑畸形伴或不伴尿道缺陷疾病诊治分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(09):866.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.09.013]
Wu Tian,Wu Shuihua.Brain malformation with or without urethral defect due to NFIA gene mutation: one case report with a literature review[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(02):866.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.09.013]
[2]吴水华,梁大中.非综合征性颅缝早闭患儿手术后ASQ-3年龄与发育进程问卷评估结果的相关因素分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2023,22(08):762.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202304003-012]
Wu Shuihua,Liang Dazhong.Analysis of factors related to ASQ-3 age and developmental process assessment questionnaire in children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis after surgery[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2023,22(02):762.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202304003-012]
[3]李制一,汪婧怡,顾硕.颅缝早闭的诊治现状及未来研究方向[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2024,(02):101.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202401007-001]
Li Zhiyi,Wang Jingyi,Gu Shuo.Current status of diagnosing and treating craniosynostosis and future research directions[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(02):101.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202401007-001]
[4]李森,詹琪佳,肖波,等.额眶前移手术对额缝早闭患儿额叶容量及社会情绪改善的效果评价[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2024,(02):119.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202311041-004]
Li Sen,Zhan Qijia,Xiao Bo,et al.Improvements of frontal lobe volume and social emotions on metopic synostosis with frontal-orbital advancement[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(02):119.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202311041-004]
[5]许新科,林浩铭,林炜,等.儿童颅缝早闭二次手术影响因素分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2024,(02):125.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312002-005]
Xu Xinke,Lin Haoming,Lin Wei,et al.Risk factors of secondary operation for craniosynostosis in children[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(02):125.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312002-005]
[6]吴水华,Dae-jung Yang.以健侧为镜像治疗单侧冠状缝早闭症疗效分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2024,(02):130.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312004-006]
Wu Shuihua,Dae-jung Yang.Efficacy of unilateral coronal craniostenosis using healthy side as a mirror image[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(02):130.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312004-006]
[7]刘雨桐,曾高.不同年龄段矢状缝早闭的手术治疗探讨[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2024,(02):109.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312012-002]
Liu Yutong,Zeng Gao.Surgical management of sagittal synostosis at different ages[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2024,(02):109.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312012-002]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-12-23。
通讯作者:李大鹏,Email:592547218@163.com