Yang Ping,Li Kangming,Zou Bing,et al.Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction:Meta-analysis of comparative studies[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2022,21(05):482-489.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202011015-015]
机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻的Meta分析
- Title:
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction:Meta-analysis of comparative studies
- 关键词:
- 肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻; 机器人手术; 腹腔镜检查; 治疗结果; Meta分析
- Keywords:
- Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Laparoscopy; Treatment Outcome; Meta-Analysis
- 摘要:
- 目的 运用Meta分析评价传统腹腔镜下肾盂成形术与机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗儿童肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻的临床效果。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane database、Web ofScience等英文数据库及中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库等中文数据库相关文献,文献公开发表时间截至2020年10月。采用RevMan5.3对文献数据进行Meta分析。二分类变量采用OR作为分析统计量;对连续型变量,采用加权均数差(mean difference,MD)作为分析统计量。对于纳入文献较少、数据不够全面的研究指标采取描述性分析。结果 最终共纳入12篇文献,有效病例数1 531例,均行肾盂成形术。机器人辅助腹腔镜手术在以下方面优于传统腹腔镜手术:手术成功率[OR=2.66,95% CI (1.09,6.49)]、手术时间[MD=-6.68,95% CI (-13.10,-0.26)]、术后住院时间[MD=-0.91,95% CI (-1.01,-0.81)]、术后并发症发生率[OR=0.49,95% CI (0.27,0.80)]、术后随访时间[MD=-3.14,95% CI (-4.37,-1.91)]、再手术率[OR=0.27,95% CI (0.08,0.90)],上述指标的组间差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。在描述性分析中,机器人辅助腹腔镜手术后镇痛药的使用率较低,但住院费用较高。结论 与传统腹腔镜肾盂成形术相比,机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻成功率更高,术后并发症及术后镇痛药的使用更少,手术时间和术后住院时间较短,患儿术后住院及随访期间因各种原因导致再次手术的发生率更低,但费用较高,在小年龄婴幼儿患者中的应用存在一定的局限性。
- Abstract:
- Objective To systematiclly review the efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) for children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Methods A literature search was performed within the databases of PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP and WanFang from the inceptions up to October 2020. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5. 3. Results A total of 12 articles involving 1531 patients were re- trieved. RALP was superior in the following aspects with significant differences:operative success rate[OR=2. 66,95% CI(1. 09,6. 49)], operative duration[MD=-6. 68, 95% CI(-13. 10,-0. 26)], postoperative length of stay[MD=-0. 91,95% CI(-1. 01,-0. 81)] and postoperative complications[OR=0. 49, 95% CI (0. 27,0. 80)]. In descriptive analysis, dosing of analgesic was less in RALP group than that in LP group and the expenditure was higher in RALP group than LP group. Conclusion As compared with LP, RALP has high- er success rate and fewer postoperative complications for UPJO. Operative duration and postoperative length of stay were shorter in the RALP group. However, the expenditure was higher.
参考文献/References:
[1] 中华医学会泌尿外科学分会小儿泌尿外科学组. 儿童机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻手术操作指南(2020版)[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 41(7):486-491. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. cn112330-20200629-00012. Urological Surgery Branch of Chinese Medical Association:Guideline for Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Uret- eropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children (2020 Edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Urology, 2020, 41(7):486-491. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. cn112330-20200629-00012.
[2] Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, et al. Robot-assisted vs lap- aroscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction ob- struction (UPJO):technical considerations and results[J]. J Pe- diatr Urol, 2019, 15(6):667. e1-e8. DOI:10. 1016/j. jpurol. 2019. 09. 018.
[3] 吕逸清, 谢华, 黄轶晨, 等. 传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜技术在儿童肾盂成形术中的临床应用对比[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志,2019,40(1):41-44. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 0253-3006. 2019. 01. 009. Lü YQ, Xie H, Huang YC, et al. Clinical analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children[J]. Chin J Pediatr Surg,2019,40(1):41-44. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 0253-3006. 2019. 01. 009.
[4] Riachy E, Cost NG, Defoor WR, et al. Pediatric standard and ro- bot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty:a comparative single insti- tution study[J]. J Urol,2013,189(1):283-287. DOI:10. 1016/j. juro. 2012. 09. 008.
[5] Casella DP, Fox JA, Schneck FX, et al. Cost analysis of pediatric robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty[J]. J Urol,2013,189(3):1083-1086. DOI:10. 1016/j. juro. 2012. 08. 259.
[6] Franco I, Dyer LL, Zelkovic P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient:hand sewn anastomosis versus robotic assisted anastomosis-is there a difference?[J]. J Urol, 2007, 178(4 Pt 1):1483-1486. DOI:10. 1016/j. juro. 2007. 06. 012.
[7] Kovacs RJ, Burris HA 3 rd. WITHDRAWN:Cardio-Oncology:Stronger Together[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2019,31:S0735-1097(19) 36086-3. DOI:10. 1016/j. jacc. 2019. 07. 041.
[8] Liu DB, Ellimoottil C, Flum AS, et al. Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparo- scopic pediatric pyeloplasty[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2014, 10(4):610-615. DOI:10. 1016/j. jpurol. 2014. 06. 010.
[9] Riachy E, Defoor WR, Reddy PP, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic py- eloplasty and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty a compara- tive single-institution study[J]. J Urol, 2012, 187(4, Supple- ment):e191-e192. DOI:10. 1016/j. juro. 2012. 02. 536.
[10] Silay MS, Danacioglu O, Ozel K, et al. Laparoscopy versus robotic- assisted pyeloplasty in children:preliminary results of a pilot pro- spective randomized controlled trial[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(8):1841-1848. DOI:10. 1007/s00345-019-02910-8.
[11] Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, et al. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children:Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Aca- demic Urologists working party[J]. JAAD Case Rep, 2016, 12(4):229. e1-e7. DOI:10. 1016/j. jpurol. 2016. 04. 007.
[12] Song SH, Lee C, Jung J, et al. A comparative study of pediatric open pyeloplasty, laparoscopy-assisted extracorporeal pyeloplasty, and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty[J]. PLoS One,2017, 12(4):e0175026. DOI:10. 1371/journal. pone. 0175026.
[13] Subotic U, Rohard I, Weber DM, et al. A minimal invasive surgi- cal approach for children of all ages with ureteropelvic junction obstruction[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2012, 8(4):354-358. DOI:10. 1016/j. jpurol. 2011. 07. 004.
[14] Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, et al. Anderson-Hynes dis- membered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic sys- tem[J]. Urology,2002,60(3):509-513. DOI:10. 1016/s0090-4295(02) 01761-2.
[15] 周辉霞, 曹华林. 机器人辅助腹腔镜手术在小儿泌尿外科的应用与现状[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(2):72-76. DOI:10. 3877/cma. j. issn. 1674-6899. 2018. 02. 003. Zhou HX, Cao HL. Application and current status of robot assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology[J]. Chin J Laparoscopic Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2018, 11(2):72-76. DOI:10. 3877/cma. J. Issn. 1674-6899. 2018. 02. 003.
[16] 徐哲, 谢钧韬, 高文宗, 等. 达芬奇机器人手术治疗小儿肾积水的初步经验[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3):9-12. DOI:10. 3877/cma. j. issn. 1674-3253. 2017. 03. 003. Xu Z, Xie JT, Gao WZ, et al. Preliminary experiences of treating pediatric hydronephrosis by Da vinci robotic surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology (Electronic Version), 2017, 11(3):9-12. DOI:10. 3877/cma. j. issn. 1674-3253. 2017. 03. 003.
[17] 吕逸清, 谢华, 黄轶晨, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下儿童肾盂成形术的初步探讨[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志,2015,36(10):721-725. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 1000-6702. 2015. 10. 001. Lü YQ, Xie H, Huang YC, et al. Preliminary results of robotic-as- sisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Urology,2015,36(10):721-725. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 1000-6702. 2015. 10. 001.
[18] Andolfi C, Adamic B, Oommen J, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscop- ic pyeloplasty in infants and children:is it superior to convention- al laparoscopy?[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(8):1827-1833. DOI:10. 1007/s00345-019-02943-z.
[19] 何大维. 儿童腹腔镜下肾盂输尿管成形术的相关问题[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志,2018, 17(6):409-411, 418. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1671-6353. 2018. 06. 003. He DW. Related problems of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children[J]. J Clin Ped Sur,2018,17(6):409-411,418. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1671-6353. 2018. 06. 003.
[20] 李宁, 周学锋, 袁继炎, 等. 达芬奇机器人在儿童肾盂成形术中的应用体会——附9 例报告[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2019,18(4):294-298. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1671-6353. 2019. 04. 009. Li N, Zhou XF, Yuan JY, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyelo- plasty in children:a report of 9 cases[J]. J Clin Ped Sur,2019, 18(4):294-298. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1671-6353. 2019. 04. 009.
[21] Cundy TP, Harling L, Hughes-Hallett A, et al. Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children[J]. BJU Int, 2014, 114(4):582-594. DOI:10. 1111/bju. 12683.
相似文献/References:
[1]宋宏程,李怡,李泽.肾脏形态及功能评估对于先天性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻手术决策的意义[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(04):301.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.04.001]
Song Hongcheng,Li Yi,Li Ze.Significance of renal morphology and function assessment in determining operative timing for congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(05):301.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.04.001]
[2]张书豪,高志刚,钭金法,等.机器人手术在小儿外科领域的应用现状[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(08):701.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.001]
Zhang Shuhao,Gao Zhigang,Tou Jinfa,et al.Current applications of robotic procedures in pediatric surgery[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(05):701.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.001]
[3]谭征,俞建根,梁靓,等.机器人辅助胸腔镜技术治疗小儿先天性肺部疾病的单中心研究[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(08):708.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.002]
Tan Zheng,Yu Jiangeng,Liang Liang,et al.Robot-assisted thoracoscopy in the treatment of congenital pulmonary diseases in children[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(05):708.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.002]
[4]赵扬,周辉霞,马立飞,等.机器人辅助腹腔镜技术应用于儿童肾上腺肿物切除术的初步经验[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(08):712.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.003]
Zhao Yang,Zhou Huixia,Ma Lifei,et al.Preliminary experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenal mass resection in children[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(05):712.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.003]
[5]章跃滨,陈青江,蔡多特,等.机器人手术系统辅助儿童脾切除术三例并文献复习[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(08):718.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.004]
Zhang Yuebin,Chen Qingjiang,Cai Duote,et al.Robot-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in children: a report of 3 cases with review of the literature[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(05):718.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.004]
[6]马洪,汤显能,郭跃明.机器人手术系统辅助经皮原位固定术治疗儿童股骨头骨骺滑脱的比较研究[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(08):724.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.005]
Ma Hong,Tang Xianneng,Guo Yueming.Comparative study of percutaneous in stu fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis assisted by surgical robotic system[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(05):724.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.005]
[7]陈艳,周立军,汪亚平,等.机器人辅助腹腔镜技术治疗儿童肾上腺嗜铬细胞瘤一例并文献复习[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(08):731.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.006]
Chen Yan,Zhou Lijun,Wang Yaping,et al.Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy for children with adrenal pheochromocytoma: one case report with a literature review[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(05):731.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.08.006]
[8]胡家祥,聂梅兰,杨嘉飞,等.儿童上尿路结石的外科治疗进展[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2021,20(10):985.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.10.017]
Hu Jiaxiang,Nie Meilan,Yang Jiafei,et al.Recent advances in surgical treatment of upper urinary calculi in children[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2021,20(05):985.[doi:10.12260/lcxewkzz.2021.10.017]
[9]朱炜玮,周辉霞,李品,等.机器人辅助腹腔镜Lich-Gregoir输尿管再植术与气膀胱Cohen输尿管再植术治疗原发性膀胱输尿管反流的疗效对比[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2022,21(05):437.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202109034-008]
Zhu Weiwei,Zhou huixia,Li Pin,et al.Comparison of clinical efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir procedure and gas-bladder laparoscopic Cohen ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2022,21(05):437.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202109034-008]
[10]董岿然.国内小儿微创外科的热点与趋势[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2022,21(07):601.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202204095-001]
Dong Kuiran.Hotspots and trends of domestic pediatric mini-invasive surgery[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2022,21(05):601.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202204095-001]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-11-8。
基金项目:四川省医学科研课题计划（S20067）
通讯作者:李康明,Email:son.of.old@foxmail.com