Liu Yuqing,Xiang Yonghua,Li Li,et al.Multi-slice spiral computed tomography features and differential diagnosis of different pathological sub- types of hepatoblastoma[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2022,21(05):452-457.[doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202111046-010]
不同病理分型肝母细胞瘤的多层螺旋CT征象与鉴别
- Title:
- Multi-slice spiral computed tomography features and differential diagnosis of different pathological sub- types of hepatoblastoma
- Keywords:
- Hepatoblastoma/DI; Hepatoblastoma/CL; Tomography; X-ray computed
- 摘要:
- 目的 探讨不同病理分型肝母细胞瘤(hepatoblastoma,HB)的多层螺旋CT (multi-slice spi-ral computed tomography,MSCT)表现。方法 回顾性分析湖南省儿童医院2015年10月至2021年5月经手术或穿刺病理活检证实的71例HB患儿影像学及临床资料,根据病理结果分为胎儿型HB (胎儿型组,共16例)、胚胎型HB (胚胎型组,共34例)、混合性上皮间叶型HB (混合性上皮间叶型组,共21例)。从肿瘤边缘是否规则,是否外生,PRETEXT分期,多发结节融合,有无瘤内出血、坏死或囊变、钙化,肿瘤假包膜是否光滑连续,有无包膜回缩征、包膜下积液、多发纤维分隔、高危影像特征等方面观察CT图像,并测量肿瘤大小、各期实性成分CT值。采用χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法分析三组患儿性别、年龄、甲胎蛋白及病灶形态特征的差异,采用单因素方差分析对比三组肿瘤直径及各期扫描CT值的差异。结果 不同病理类型HB在肿瘤最大径,病灶边缘规则,瘤内多发结节融合、出血、坏死或囊变、钙化,包膜回缩征,多发纤维分隔上的阳性率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。胎儿型主要表现为肿瘤直径较小,边缘较规则,瘤内密度更均匀;胚胎型多呈多灶型结节改变,坏死及囊变较多见;混合性上皮间叶型主要表现为瘤内出血及钙化率高,延迟期多发纤维分隔、包膜回缩征阳性率高。胚胎型的病灶门脉期绝对强化程度小于胎儿型、混合性上皮间叶型(P<0.05)。结论 不同病理分型HB患儿的CT征象存在一定差异,且各有特点,CT表现可在一定程度上鉴别HB的病理亚型。
- Abstract:
- Objective To explore the multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) features and dif- ferential diagnosis of different pathological subtypes of hepatoblastoma (HB). Methods Imaging and clinical data were retrospectively reviewed for 71 HB children confirmed by surgery or puncture biopsy. According to the pathological results, they were divided into fetal, embryonal and mixed epithelial & mesenchymal types. CT ima- ges were observed from whether tumor margin was regular, exogenous, PRETEXT staging, multiple nodule fu- sion, intratumoral hemorrhage, necrosis or cyst, calcification, neoplastic envelope was smooth and continuous, whether capsule retraction, subcapsule effusion, multiple fiber separation and high-risk image characteristics. Tumor size and CT value of solid components of each phase were measured. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was utilized for comparing differences in gender, age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and focal morphological charac- teristics. Independent sample analysis of variance was employed for comparing differences in tumor size and CT values among three groups. Results Statistically significant differences existed in tumor maximum diameter, regular margins, multiple nodules, hemorrhage, necrosis or cystic degeneration, calcification, multiple fibrous separation and capsule retraction among different pathological subtypes (P < 0. 05). Fetal type had the CT features of small tumor diameter, regular margin and more uniform intratumoral density; embryonal type features more multifocal nodules, necrosis or cystic degeneration;mixed epithelial and mesenchymal type was associated with a high rate of intratumoral hemorrhage and calcification and a high incidence of delayed multiple fibrous separation and capsule retraction. During portal phase, absolute embryonal enhancement was less than that of fe- tal or mixed epithelial & mesenchymal type (P < 0. 05). Conclusion Different pathological subtypes of HB have different CT signs with their own characteristics. And CT imaging can distinguish the pathological subtypes of HB to a certain extent.
参考文献/References:
[1] 中华医学会病理学分会儿科病理学组, 福棠儿童医学发展研究中心病理专业委员会. 肝母细胞瘤病理诊断专家共识[J]. 中华病理学杂志,2019,48(3):176-181. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 0529-5807. 2019. 03. 002. Pediatric Diseases Group of Chinese Society of Pathology,Specialty Committee of Pathology,Futang Research. Center of Pediatric De- velopment Chinese Expert Group Consensus on Pathological Diag- nosis of Hepatoblastoma[J]. Chin J Pathol, 2019, 48(3):176-181. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 0529-5807. 2019. 03. 002.
[2] Jiang Y, Sun J, Xia Y, et al. Preoperative assessment for event- free survival with hepatoblastoma in pediatric patients by develo- ping a CT-based radiomics model[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11:644994. DOI:10. 3389/fonc. 2021. 644994.
[3] 中国抗癌协会小儿肿瘤专业委员会, 中华医学会小儿外科分会肿瘤专业组. 儿童肝母细胞瘤多学科诊疗专家共识(CCCG-HB -2016)[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2017, 38(10):733-739. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 0253-3006. 2017. 10. 003. Chinese Anti-Cancer Association Pediatric Committee,China Med- ical Association Pediatric Onco-surgery Group. Expert Consensus for Multidisciplinary Management of Hepatoblastoma (CCCG-HB -2016)[J]. Chin J Pediatr Surg,2017,38(10):733-739. DOI:10. 3760/cma. j. issn. 0253-3006. 2017. 10. 003.
[4] Czauderna P, Lopez-Terrada D, Hiyama E, et al. Hepatoblastoma state of the art:pathology, genetics, risk stratification and chemo- therapy[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2014, 26(1):19-28. DOI:10. 1097/MOP. 0000000000000046.
[5] Kremer N, Walther AE, Tiao GM. Management of hepatoblasto- ma:an update[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2014, 26(3):362-369. DOI:10. 1097/MOP. 0000000000000081.
[6] Von Schweinitz D. Hepatoblastoma:recent developments in re- search and treatment[J]. Semin Pediatr Surg,2012,21(1):21-30. DOI:10. 1053/j. sempedsurg. 2011. 10. 011.
[7] Towbin AJ, Meyers RL, Woodley H, et al. 2017 PRETEXT:radio- logic staging system for primary hepatic malignancies of child- hood revised for the Paediatric Hepatic International Tumour Tri- al (PHITT)[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2018, 48(4):536-554. DOI:10. 1007/s00247-018-4078-z.
[8] Baheti AD, Chapman T, Rudzinski E, et al. Diagnosis, histopatho- logic correlation and management of hepatoblastoma:What the ra- diologist needs to know[J]. Clin Imaging, 2018, 52:273-279. DOI:10. 1016/j. clinimag. 2018. 08. 009.
[9] Brugières L, Branchereau S, Laithier V. Paediatric malignant liver tumours[J]. Bull Cancer, 2012, 99(2):219-228. DOI:10. 1684/bdc. 2011. 1539.
[10] Czauderna P, Haeberle B, Hiyama E, et al. The Children’s He- patic tumors International Collaboration (CHIC):Novel global rare tumor database yields new prognostic factors in hepatoblas- toma and becomes a research model[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2016, 52:92-101. DOI:10. 1016/j. ejca. 2015. 09. 023.
[11] Vokuhl C, Oyen F, H?berle B, et al. Small cell undifferentiated (SCUD) hepatoblastomas:All malignant rhabdoid tumors?[J]. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 2016, 55(12):925-931. DOI:10. 1002/gcc. 22390.
[12] 马靖, 张忠德, 沈萍, 等. 小儿肝母细胞瘤58例临床病理分析[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志, 2015, 31(2):169-173. DOI:10. 13315/j. cnki. cjcep. 2015. 02. 013. Ma J, Zhang ZD, Shen P, et al. Hepatoblastomas in childhood:a clinicopathologic analysis of 58 cases[J]. J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015,31(2):169-173. DOI:10. 13315/j. cnki. cjcep. 2015. 02. 013.
[13] 李理, 刘文, 金科. 先天性肝母细胞瘤CT表现及误诊分析[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2021, 29(4):358-361. DOI:CNKI:SUN:ZYYZ. 0. 2021-04-018. Li L, Liu W, Jin K. CT findings and misdiagnosis of congenital hepatoblastoma[J]. J Med Imaging, 2021, 29(4):358-361. DOI:CNKI:SUN:ZYYZ. 0. 2021-04-018.
[14] Baheti AD, Luana Stanescu A, Li N, et al. Contrast-enhanced CT features of hepatoblastoma:Can we predict histopathology?[J]. Clin Imaging, 2017, 44:33-37. DOI:10. 1016/j. clin- imag. 2017. 03. 023
[15] 王夏婉, 高剑波, 柴亚如. 儿童不同病理类型肝母细胞瘤的CT表现[J]. 世界华人消化杂志,2016,24(11):1741-1747. DOI:10. 11569/wcjd. v24. i11. 1741. Wang XW, Gao JB, Chai YR. CT features of hepatoblastomas of different pathological types in children[J]. World Chinese Jour- nal of Digestology,2016,24(11):1741-1747. DOI:10. 11569/wcjd. v24. i11. 1741.
[16] 张龚巍, 李钱程, 张欢, 等. CT扫描对肝母细胞瘤病理分型预测价值初探[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2020, 39(12):2507-2512. DOI:10. 13437/j. cnki. jcr. 2020. 12. 033. Zhang GW, Li QC, Zhang H, et al. Preliminary study on predic- tive value of CT imaging features for pathological type of hepato- blastoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 2020, 39(12):2507-2512. DOI:10. 13437/j. cnki. jcr. 2020. 12. 033.
[17] 白凤森, 闫縮淳, 袁新宇, 等. 基于儿童肝母细胞瘤PRE- TEXT分期的不同扫描期相的CT征象比较[J]. 中华放射学杂志,2017,51(5):386-390. DOI:CNKI:SUN:ZHGS. 0. 2017-05-017. Bai FS, Yan YC, Yuan XY, et al. Comparison study of CT find- ings at different phases among pediatric hepatoblastoma patients based upon PRETEXT system[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2017, 51(5):386-390. DOI:CNKI:SUN:ZHGS. 0. 2017-05-017.
[18] d’Assignies G, Couvelard A, Bahrami S, et al. Pancreatic endo- crine tumors:tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT re- flects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors[J]. Radiology,2009,250(2):407-416. DOI:10. 1148/radiol. 2501080291.
[19] 吴恩惠, 李欣, 邵剑波. 中华影像医学:儿科影像卷[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2010,349-350. Wu EH, Li X, Shao JB. Chinese medicine imaging:pediatric im- aging volume[M]. Beijing:People’s Medical Publishing House, 2010,349-350.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-11-21。
基金项目:湖南省科技厅临床医疗技术创新引导计划项目（S2020SFYLJS0680）
通讯作者:金科,Email:jinke001@sina.com