临床小儿外科杂志  2026, Vol. 25 Issue (9): 882-887  DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312066

引用本文  

万成亮, 白强, 张传勃, 等. 穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长的早期预测模型建立与验证[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2026, 25(9): 882-887.   DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312066
Wan CL, Bai Q, Zhang CB, et al. Establishment and validation of an early nomogram for predicting prolonged length of stay in children with perforated appendicitis[J]. J Clin Ped Sur, 2026, 25(9): 882-887.   DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202312066

基金项目

2026年度昆明市卫生科研课题(2026-06-02-006);云南省院士专家工作站(202605AF350095);云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2024J0382);2022年度昆明市卫生科研课题(2022-06-02-002)

通信作者

海波, Email: 1hbspring@163.com

文章历史

收稿日期:2023-12-28
穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长的早期预测模型建立与验证
万成亮 , 白强 , 张传勃 , 段昀盈 , 黄纯锋 , 郑陈军 , 海波     
昆明市儿童医院 昆明医科大学附属儿童医院普通外科,昆明 650018
摘要:目的 构建可早期预测穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长风险的列线图模型。方法 本研究为病例对照研究,回顾性收集2019年1月至2022年12月昆明市儿童医院普通外科收治、行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的穿孔性阑尾炎患儿临床资料,共818例;按7 ∶ 3比例随机划分为建模组575例、验证组243例。以本组患儿住院时间第75百分位数(≥11 d)为截断值,将病例分为住院时间正常组、住院时间延长组。单因素分析两组临床、手术相关指标差异,将有统计学意义变量纳入多因素Logistic向前逐步回归,筛选住院时间延长独立危险因素;基于回归结果采用R 3.6.3构建列线图预测模型。通过ROC曲线评价模型区分效能,Bootstrap重复抽样法完成内部验证,采用验证组数据集开展外部验证。结果 建模组单因素分析显示:发病时间、术前B超提示腹腔积液、术前C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)、术前抗感染治疗、术中腹腔冲洗、术中留置腹腔引流管、术中出血量、手术时间在两组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归剔除无统计学意义变量(术前抗感染治疗、术中留置引流管、术中出血量,P>0.05),最终确定发病时间、术前B超腹腔积液、术前CRP、术中腹腔冲洗、手术时间为住院时间延长独立影响因素(P<0.05)。建模组ROC曲线下面积=0.915,95%CI:0.889~0.942;验证组AUC=0.926,95%CI:0.892~0.961;模型区分度良好。Bootstrap内部验证平均绝对误差0.021,预测校准曲线与理想曲线贴合度高,模型预测准确度可靠。结论 发病时间、术前腹腔积液、术前CRP水平、术中腹腔冲洗、手术时长与穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长独立相关;基于上述指标构建的列线图模型预测效能、校准度优异,可于入院早期识别住院延长高危患儿,对临床针对性干预有指导意义。
关键词:儿童    穿孔性阑尾炎    列线图    预测模型    住院时间    
Establishment and validation of an early nomogram for predicting prolonged length of stay in children with perforated appendicitis
Wan Chengliang , Bai Qiang , Zhang Chuanbo , Duan Yunying , Huang Chunfeng , Zheng Chenjun , Hai Bo     
Department of General Surgery, Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Kunming Children's Hospital, Kunming 650018, China
Abstract: Objective To establish an early nomogram model for predicting prolonged length of stay in children with perforated appendicitis (PA). Methods The relevant clinical data were retrospectively reviewed for 818 PA children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy at the Department of General Surgery, Kunming Children's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2022.All patients were randomized at a ratio of 7∶3 into a derivation cohort (n=575) and a validation cohort (n=243).The 75th percentile of hospitalization duration (≥11 days) was set as a cut-off value for assigning them into two sub-groups of normal hospitalization and prolonged length of stay.Univariate analysis was performed for comparing the clinical and surgical parameters between two subgroups.Parameters with statistical significance were included in multivariate forward stepwise Logistic regression to screen independent risk factors for prolonged length of stay.R 3.6.3 software was utilized for constructing a nomogram based upon regression outputs.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for assessing discrimination capacity; Bootstrap resampling for internal validation and external validation conducted with the independent validation cohort. Results Univariate analysis of derivation cohort demonstrated significant intergroup differences (P < 0.05) in time from symptom onset to admission, preoperative ultrasonographic peritoneal effusion, preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP), preoperative antibiotic therapy, intraoperative peritoneal lavage, intraoperative abdominal drainage placing, intraoperative volume of blood loss and operative duration.Multivariate Logistic regression eliminated three non-significant confounding factors of preoperative antibiotic therapy, intraoperative drainage tubing and intraoperative volume of blood loss (P>0.05).Five independent risk factors were identified as time from symptom onset, preoperative peritoneal effusion on ultrasound, preoperative CRP, intraoperative peritoneal lavage and operative duration (P < 0.05).The area under ROC curve (AUC) of derivation cohort was 0.915(95%CI: 0.889-0.942) while AUC of validation cohort reached 0.926(95%CI: 0.892-0.961), indicating satisfactory discrimination performance.Internal Bootstrap validation presented a mean absolute error of 0.021.A favorable fitting between predicted calibration curve and ideal curve verified reliable predictive accuracy of the model. Conclusions Time from symptom onset, preoperative peritoneal effusion, preoperative CRP, intraoperative peritoneal lavage and operative duration are independently correlated with prolonged length of stay among PA children.The nomogram constructed by these routinely available parameters exhibits excellent discrimination and calibration.Thus it enables early identification of high-risk children and facilitates targeted clinical interventions.
Key words: Child    Perforated Appendicitis    Nomogram    Prediction Model    Length of Stay    

急性阑尾炎是儿科最常见急腹症,儿童发病率约为普通人群4倍[1]。小儿解剖、生理发育不成熟,临床症状隐匿、病情进展迅速,极易进展为阑尾化脓、穿孔,严重时继发脓毒症、感染中毒性休克;且低龄儿童无法清晰表述自身不适,增加临床诊断难度[2-4]。现有文献报道儿童阑尾炎穿孔率为31.8% ~45.8%,学龄前患儿穿孔风险更高,阑尾穿孔可诱发多重围手术期并发症,直接延长住院周期[5-7]。本研究基于穿孔性阑尾炎患儿入院早期即可获取的临床、手术指标构建列线图预测模型并完成内、外部验证,旨在为临床早期识别住院延长高危患儿、实施个体化干预、缩短住院时长、优化医疗资源配置提供量化参考。

资料与方法 一、临床资料

本研究为病例对照研究,回顾性纳入2019年1月至2022年12月昆明市儿童医院普通外科确诊穿孔性阑尾炎、行腹腔镜阑尾切除术患儿818例。纳入标准:①就诊年龄<18周岁;②入院24 h内完成腹腔镜阑尾切除术;③术后病理确诊穿孔性阑尾炎。排除标准:①中转开腹或初始行开腹阑尾切除术;②合并重度呼吸、血液、心血管系统及其他严重基础内科疾病;③近3个月有腹部手术史;④治疗期间自动出院、病历关键资料缺失。出院标准:①患儿恢复正常经口进食,无持续发热、腹痛、腹胀,手术切口甲级愈合;②出院前复查血常规中性粒细胞、血清CRP恢复正常;③腹腔B超未见包裹性积液、腹腔残余感染征象。其中男性501例,女性317例,年龄1~15岁。采用SPSS软件生成随机数字,按7 ∶ 3分为建模组575例、验证组243例。以全部病例住院时间第75百分位数(≥11 d)为分界标准,将建模组划分为住院时间正常组、住院时间延长组。本研究已通过昆明市儿童医院伦理委员会审批(2024-05-040-K001)。

二、观察指标

调取本院电子病历系统,由3名研究人员统一采集患儿入院早期临床指标,建立标准化数据库,录入信息包括:性别、年龄、发病时间(症状出现至入院间隔时长)、术前腹部B超结果、入院前后术前抗感染用药史、血清电解质、凝血功能、术前C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP);手术相关指标:手术时长、术中出血量、术中是否实施腹腔冲洗、术中是否留置腹腔引流管、阑尾粪石;结局指标:总住院天数。

三、统计学处理

采用SPSS 26.0完成基础统计分析,分类资料采用χ2检验,符合正态分布的计量资料采用两独立样本t检验,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。将单因素分析P<0.05的变量纳入二元Logistic向前逐步回归,筛选住院时间延长独立危险因素;采用R 3.6.3基于回归系数绘制可视化列线图预测模型。模型效能评价:绘制ROC曲线计算AUC值,评估模型区分度、灵敏度、特异度;采用Bootstrap重复抽样1 000次开展内部校准验证;利用独立验证组数据集完成模型外部验证。

结果

建模组、验证组患儿性别、年龄、影像学、实验室、手术及住院时长等基线指标对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。见表 1。

表 1 建模组与验证组穿孔性阑尾炎患儿基线资料比较 Table 1 Comparison of baseline profiles between modeling and validation groups

将建模组575例分为住院时间正常组417例、延长组158例。单因素分析显示,8项指标组间差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05):发病时间、术前B超腹腔积液、术前CRP、术前抗感染治疗、术中腹腔冲洗、术中留置引流管、术中出血量、手术时间;性别、年龄、电解质紊乱、凝血异常、阑尾粪石组间对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。见表 2。

表 2 建模组穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长的单因素分析结果 Table 2 Univariate analysis results of prolonged hospitalization stay in children with perforated appendicitis in modeling group

将单因素筛选出的8项有统计学意义变量纳入向前逐步Logistic回归,剔除3项无统计学意义变量:术前抗感染治疗、术中留置腹腔引流管、术中出血量(P>0.05);最终确定5项住院时间延长独立危险因素。见表 3。

表 3 建模组穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长的多因素Logistic回归分析 Table 3 Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of prolonged hospitalization stay in children with perforated appendicitis in modeling group

基于5项独立危险因素(发病时间、术前B超腹腔积液、术前CRP、术中腹腔冲洗、手术时间),构建预测穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长概率的列线图(图 1)。分别计算建模组、验证组病例预测概率并绘制ROC曲线(图 2)。建模组AUC=0.915,95%CI:0.889~0.942;验证组AUC=0.926,95% CI:0.892~0.961,模型区分效能优秀。重复抽样1000次实施内部验证,绘制校准曲线(图 3),模型平均绝对误差0.021,预测曲线与理想曲线贴合良好,模型预测概率与实际发生概率一致性高。


图 1 穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长发生概率的列线图预测模型 Fig.1 Column chart prediction model for assessing the probability of prolonged hospitalization stay in children with perforated appendicitis 注 分别读取各变量对应分值,累加得到总得分,总分对应标尺数值即为患儿住院时间延长的预测发生概率


图 2 建模组及验证组穿孔性阑尾炎病例预测概率的ROC曲线 Fig.2 ROC curves for modeling and validation groups


图 3 穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时间延长发生概率列线图的校准曲线 Fig.3 Calibration curve of assessing the probability of prolonged hospitalization stay in children with perforated appendicitis using a column chart
讨论

穿孔性阑尾炎属于儿童高危急腹症,相较于单纯急性阑尾炎,围手术期并发症、不良事件发生率显著升高,住院周期明显延长[8-10]。Newman等[11]多中心研究显示,穿孔性阑尾炎患儿住院时长约为非穿孔患儿3倍,医疗支出同步上升。本研究818例穿孔性阑尾炎患儿平均住院时间9.52 d(4~32 d),个体住院周期差异显著,因此入院早期建立可快速使用的量化预测工具,对围手术期精细化管理、医疗资源优化、改善患儿预后具备临床价值。

列线图将多因素回归模型可视化,可实现个体化风险量化评估,已广泛应用于各类外科疾病风险预测[12-15]。但现有相关研究存在局限性:Liu等[13]构建的腹腔镜阑尾术后住院延长模型纳入全部急性阑尾炎患儿,未针对穿孔这一重症亚群开展专项分析。本研究经多因素回归筛选出5项独立预测指标:发病时间、术前B超腹腔积液、术前CRP、术中腹腔冲洗、手术时间,全部为入院早期常规采集指标,各级医院均可便捷获取,临床推广门槛低。建模组、验证组AUC均>0.9,Bootstrap校准误差仅0.021,证实模型区分度、校准度均处于较高水平,与既往儿童穿孔阑尾炎影像学、炎症指标相关研究结论一致。相较于传统单一指标判断、临床经验评估,列线图量化各危险因素权重,结果直观,便于医护人员向家属解释病情、预估住院周期,提升家属治疗配合度。

基于模型预测结果可实施分层围手术期管理。对于高风险患儿,尽可能缩短症状发作至手术间隔,规避治疗延迟带来的感染加重风险;术前B超提示腹腔积液、CRP显著升高提示腹腔重度感染,术后强化抗感染方案,动态监测炎症指标;优先由经验丰富医师完成腹腔镜手术,术中规范腹腔冲洗,依据术中情况合理放置引流,强化术后并发症监测;手术时长延长提示病变复杂,术后重点观察腹腔脓肿、粘连、切口感染等并发症。对于低风险患儿,遵循加速康复外科理念优化诊疗流程,在保障安全前提下适度缩短抗生素疗程、鼓励早期下床活动、尽早经口进食,制定个体化出院标准,减少无指征延长住院观察,合理分流医疗资源,降低住院成本。本研究存在一定局限性,仅采用同院数据完成外部验证,未纳入多中心病例,存在一定选择偏倚;纳入变量仅为常规临床、手术指标,未纳入部分炎症亚组、营养相关指标。后续计划开展多中心、大样本前瞻性研究,更新优化模型参数,提升模型外部普适性,更好服务临床早期高危筛查与个体化干预。

利益冲突   所有作者声明不存在利益冲突

作者贡献声明  万成亮、海波负责研究的选题、设计及实施;张传勃、郑陈军、黄纯锋负责研究数据的收集与整理;万成亮、段昀盈负责统计学分析及文章的撰写;白强负责文章的质量控制及审校

参考文献
[1]
Howell EC, Dubina ED, Steven LL. Perforation risk in pediatric appendicitis: assessment and management[J]. Pediatric Health Med Ther, 2018, 9: 135-145. DOI:10.2147/PHMT.S155302
[2]
Willis ZI, Duggan EM, Bucher BT, et al. Effect of a clinical practice guideline for pediatric complicated appendicitis[J]. JAMA Surg, 2016, 151(5): e160194. DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0194
[3]
Pogorelić Z, Domjanović J, Jukić M, et al. Acute appendicitis in children younger than five years of age: diagnostic challenge for pediatric surgeons[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2020, 21(3): 239-245. DOI:10.1089/sur.2019.175
[4]
丁志丽, 包景峰, 孙海亮, 等. Alvarado评分与C反应蛋白、中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值对小儿穿孔性阑尾炎诊断价值的研究[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2023, 22(11): 1060-1064.
Ding ZL, Bao JF, Sun HL, et al. Diagnostic value of Alvarado score, C-reactive protein and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in children with perforated appendicitis[J]. J Clin Ped Sur, 2023, 22(11): 1060-1064. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202201022-011
[5]
Araim F, Shmelev A, Kowdley GC. Incidence of complicated appendicitis as a metric of health care delivery[J]. Am Surg, 2022, 88(4): 597-607. DOI:10.1177/0003134820953769
[6]
Gray DT, Mizrahi T. Trends in appendicitis and perforated appendicitis prevalence in children in the United States, 2001-2015[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2020, 3(10): e2023484. DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23484
[7]
Zhang SM, Chen J, Li H, et al. Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in laparoscopic treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2023, 39(1): 178. DOI:10.1007/s00383-023-05439-5
[8]
Boettcher M, Gunther P, Breil T. The Heidelberg appendicitis score predicts perforated appendicitis in children[J]. Clin Pediatr (Phila), 2017, 56(12): 1115-1119. DOI:10.1177/0009922816678976
[9]
Ribeiro AM, Romero I, Pereira CC, et al. Inflammatory parameters as predictive factors for complicated appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2022, 74: 103266. DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103266
[10]
Cheng Y, Xiong XZ, Lu J, et al. Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 6(6): CD011670. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011670.pub2
[11]
Newman K, Ponsky T, Kittle K, et al. Appendicitis 2000:variability in practice, outcomes, and resource utilization at thirty pediatric hospitals[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2003, 38(3): 372-379. DOI:10.1053/jpsu.2003.50111
[12]
滕沁伶, 鞠梅, 刘章英, 等. 基于列线图的儿童脓毒症早期诊断模型的建立[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2022, 24(12): 1345-1350.
Teng QL, Ju M, Liu ZY, et al. Establishment of a nomogram model for an early diagnosis of childhood sepsis[J]. Chin J Contemp Pediatr, 2022, 24(12): 1345-1350. DOI:10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2206055
[13]
Liu M, Yang P, Gou YP, et al. Nomogram prediction model for length of hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients: a retrospective study[J]. Front Pediatr, 2024, 12: 1441263. DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1441263
[14]
Khan S, Siow VS, Lewis A, et al. An evidence-based care protocol improves outcomes and decreases cost in pediatric appendicitis[J]. J Surg Res, 2020, 256: 390-396. DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.067
[15]
Liu DZ, Wang YC, Sun LY, et al. Establishment and validation of a nomogram for predicting postoperative intestinal adhesion in children with acute appendicitis[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2024, 24(1): 730. DOI:10.1186/s12887-024-05213-z