临床小儿外科杂志  2025, Vol. 24 Issue (4): 381-385  DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202307057-015

引用本文  

李春华, 申琴. 改良Bevan术治疗小儿高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝的疗效观察[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2025, 24(4): 381-385.   DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202307057-015
Li CH, Shen Q. Efficacy of modified Bevan surgery for high cryptorchidism with oblique inguinal hernia in children[J]. J Clin Ped Sur, 2025, 24(4): 381-385.   DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101785-202307057-015

通信作者

申琴,Email: tangal_ing@126.com

文章历史

收稿日期:2023-07-27
改良Bevan术治疗小儿高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝的疗效观察
李春华 , 申琴     
恩施土家族苗族自治州中心医院泌尿外科,恩施 445000
摘要目的 观察改良Bevan术治疗小儿高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝的临床效果、并发症以及对血清应激指标的影响。方法 对2018年7月至2021年2月恩施土家族苗族自治州中心医院85例高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝患儿资料进行回顾性分析,根据手术方法进行分组,45例实施改良Bevan术,纳入A组;40例实施Saha-jeap术,纳入B组。比较两组患儿围手术期指标(手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间),术后24 h血清皮质醇(cortisol, Cor)、前列腺素E2(prostaglandin E2, PGE2)及术后并发症、复发情况和外观满意度。结果 两组均顺利完成手术,睾丸均牵引至阴囊底部,血供良好。A组手术时间[(40.41±4.12)min比(48.37±6.09)min, t=13.392, P<0.001]、术后肛门排气时间[(16.12±1.75)h比(20.19±2.13)h, t=28.662, P<0.001]、术后住院时间[(1.48±0.27)d比(2.02±0.54)d, t=11.419, P<0.001]均短于B组;术中出血量[(3.79±0.43)mL比(4.06±0.48)mL, t=5.775, P<0.01]少于B组, 术后24 h血清Cor[(12.22±3.69)μmol/L比(14.37±4.14)μmol/L, t=2.532, P=0.013]、PGE2[(13.19±5.03)ng/mL比(16.21±5.61)ng/mL, t=2.617, P=0.011]水平低于B组, 术后随访6~12个月,A组并发症发生率低于B组(χ2=4.575, P < 0.05),外观满意度高于B组(Z=2.234, P < 0.05)。结论 相比于Saha-jeap术,改良Bevan术治疗小儿高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝在手术创伤、并发症及术后外观满意度等方面具有明显优势。
关键词隐睾    疝, 腹股沟    睾丸固定术    治疗结果    手术后并发症    儿童    
Efficacy of modified Bevan surgery for high cryptorchidism with oblique inguinal hernia in children
Li Chunhua , Shen Qin     
Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia & Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, China
Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy and complications of modified Bevan surgery for high cryptorchidism with oblique inguinal hernia in children and examine the impact on serum stress parameters. Methods From July 2018 to February 2021, retrospective analysis was performed for 85 children with high cryptorchidism complicated with oblique inguinal hernia.According to surgical approaches, 45 cases undergoing modified Bevan surgery were classified as group A while another 40 cases undergoing Saha-jeap surgery as group B.Perioperative parameters of operative duration, in traoperative volume of blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization stay, serum levels of cortisol (Cor) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) at 24h post-operation, complications, recurrence and appearance satisfaction during 6-12 months of post-operative follow-ups were compared between two groups. Results All surgical procedures were successfully completed with testicle traction to scrotal bottom and abundant blood supply.The surgical time [(40.41±4.12) min vs.(48.37±6.09) min, t=13.392, P < 0.001], postoperative anal exhaust time [(16.12±1.75) h vs.(20.19±2.13) h, t=28.662, P < 0.001] and postoperative hospital stay [(1.48±0.27) d vs.(2.02±0.54) d, t=11.419, P < 0.001] in group A were shorter than those in group B, and the intraoperative blood loss [(3.79±0.43) mL vs.(4.06±0.48) mL, t=5.775, P < 0.01] was less than that in group B, and the levels of serum Cor [(12.22±3.69) μmol/L vs.(14.37±4.14) μmol/L, t=2.532, P=0.013] and PGE2 [(13.19±5.03) ng/mL vs.(16.21±5.61) ng/mL, t=2.617, P=0.011] at 24 hours after surgery were lower than those in group B.At 6-12 months of follow-up after surgery, the incidence rate of complications in group A was lower than that in group B (χ2=4.575, P < 0.05) while the appearance satisfaction was higher than that in group B (Z=2.23, P < 0.05). Conclusions As compared with Saha-jeap surgery, modified Bevan surgery for high cryptorchidism with oblique inguinal hernia in children offers obvious advantages in terms of surgical trauma, complications and postoperative appearance satisfaction.
Key words: Cryptorchidism    Hernia, Inguinal    Orchiopexy    Treatment Outcome    Postoperative Complications    Child    

隐睾是指睾丸在发育过程中未正常下降至阴囊,导致阴囊内仅有单侧睾丸甚至无睾丸[1]。高位隐睾是指睾丸位于腹股沟内环口以上的隐睾,可位于腹腔甚至肾下极,体格检查无法触及[2-3]。隐睾患儿如长时间未自愈或未治疗,可导致成年后不育。而隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝患儿手术难度增加,术后更容易出现鞘膜积液、疝囊感染等并发症[4]。若出生后6个月睾丸仍未下降至阴囊,通常建议手术治疗,常见术式包括肉膜囊内固定术、阴囊侧前方切口睾丸下降固定术等,但术中麻醉下处理腹股沟管外环口与睾丸时,极易引发鞘膜积液等并发症[5]。基于此,笔者在传统Bevan术的基础上加以改良,在保留该术式优势的同时尽可能完善其缺陷。此外,应激反应是机体创伤性手术后的一种防御性表现,在此过程中机体释放大量细胞因子,是引起术后并发症、影响术后康复进程的重要因素,目前关于改良Bevan术对于术后应激的影响及相关文献较少[6]。本研究旨在观察改良Bevan术治疗伴腹股沟斜疝的高位隐睾患儿的临床效果及其对并发症和应激反应的影响,并与Saha-jeap术式进行上述指标对比。

资料与方法 一、一般资料

本研究为回顾性研究。收集2018年7月至2021年2月恩施土家族苗族自治州中心医院收治的85例高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝患儿临床资料,根据手术方法进行分组,其中45例实施改良Bevan术,为A组;40例实施Saha-jeap术,为B组。病例纳入标准:①诊断为单侧高位隐睾伴同侧腹股沟斜疝;②年龄1~3岁;③临床资料完整。排除标准:①合并先天性神经系统疾病;②合并严重感染、血液系统疾病;③既往有腹部手术史;④因嵌顿疝而行急诊手术。两组患儿一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性,见表 1

表 1 两组高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝患儿一般资料比较 Table 1 Comparison of general profiles between two groups of children with high cryptorchidism and oblique inguinal hernia
二、手术方法 (一) 改良Bevan术

麻醉后消毒铺巾,于腹股沟区取长约3 cm横切口,切开皮肤、皮下组织和腹股沟筋膜,暴露腹股沟管并逐层切开,注意避免损伤精索及血管。用钳子轻轻牵拉精索,将睾丸引出腹腔。如睾丸位于腹腔深部,则将其后的纤维索带松解,使睾丸下降。检查睾丸大小、位置和血供,牵引并固定于阴囊内。于腹股沟斜疝处植入无张力疝网,使其覆盖在腹股沟管口并固定,逐层缝合切口,确保无活动性出血。用7号针头穿入3号线制成U型圈,于腹股沟切口处用蚊式钳穿越外环口,制作直抵阴囊底部的分离隧道,钝性分离,构成三角空间,将7号针头自此空间穿入阴囊,用蚊式钳沿针身移动至针头方向,并从腹股沟切口处拉出;U型圈剪开成两条平行线,检查并确认精索无扭转,将其用穿针牵引固定于睾丸两侧;用蚊式钳配合涤纶编织袋牵引,将睾丸沿制作好的隧道牵拉至阴囊底部;截取8号吸痰管1.5 cm,将阴囊外牵引线连针穿透吸痰管壁并固定。术后1周拆除牵引线。

(二) Saha-jeap术

麻醉后消毒铺巾,于腹股沟区取长约3 cm横切口,逐层切开皮肤、皮下组织,制作皮下隧道直至阴囊,沿阴囊底部切开,小心剥离皮下组织,暴露精索和睾丸,用湿润的无菌纱布保护周围组织,将精索和睾丸牵拉至阴囊内,避免输精管和精索血管扭曲或损伤,在确保睾丸位置正确和血供后,用不可吸收性缝线固定睾丸韧带,检查手术区域,确保无活动性出血,逐层缝合切口。

三、观察指标

比较两组手术相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间及住院时间),术后24 h血生化指标以及术后6~12个月有无并发症、复发情况及外观满意度。

血清应激指标检测:于术后24 h采血,采用酶联免疫吸附法测定血清皮质醇(cortisol, Cor)、前列腺素E2(prostaglandin E2, PGE2)水平。

外观满意度:采用科室自制问卷调查表收集患儿家属对术后外观的满意度,评分范围0~10分,结果分为满意(>9分)、基本满意(7~9分)、不满意(< 7分)[5]

四、统计学处理

采用SPSS 22.0进行统计学分析,计数资料以频数、构成比表示,组间比较采用χ2检验,其中等级资料的比较采用Z检验;服从正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,组间比较采用两独立样本t检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果 一、手术相关指标比较

两组均顺利完成手术,睾丸均牵引至阴囊底部,且血供丰富。A组手术时间、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间均短于B组,术中出血量小于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),见表 2

表 2 两组高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝患儿手术相关指标比较(x±s) Table 2 Comparison of surgery-related parameters between two groups of children with highcryptorchidism and oblique inguinal hernia (x±s)
二、术后血生化指标比较

A组术后24 h血清Cor、PGE2水平均低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),见表 3

表 3 两组高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝患儿术后血生化指标比较(x±s) Table 3 Comparison of postoperative blood biochemical parameters between two groups of childrenwith high cryptorchidism and oblique inguinal hernia (x±s)
三、手术并发症及复发情况比较

术后随访6~12个月,A组并发症发生率低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),两组复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),见表 4

表 4 两组高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝患儿手术并发症及复发情况比较 Table 4 Comparison of surgical complications and recurrence status between two groupsof children with high cryptorchidism and oblique inguinal hernia
四、术后伤口外观满意度比较

A组伤口外观总满意度高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),见表 5

表 5 两组高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝患儿术后伤口外观满意度比较[n(%)] Table 5 Comparison of postoperative appearance satisfaction between two groups of childrenwith high cryptorchidism and oblique inguinal hernia [n(%)]
讨论

隐睾通常是由发育异常、睾丸引带牵拉等诸多因素综合作用所致; 随着病程延长,可能影响生育能力,甚至引发睾丸癌[7]。小儿高位隐睾常合并腹股沟斜疝,可进一步引发疝囊嵌顿等急性并发症[8]

目前针对合并腹股沟斜疝的高位隐睾,通常以手术治疗为主,且倾向于选择更隐蔽的切口、更小的创伤来实现治疗效果[9-10]。对于高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝,临床常用术式如阴囊小切口肉膜囊内固定术、阴囊侧前方切口睾丸下降固定术等,手术视野均较差,且在处理伴腹股沟斜疝时,由于距离外环口较远,在高位结扎鞘状突或疝囊时往往容易牵扯周围组织[11-12]。Bevan术式、Saha-jeap术式采用腹横纹切口,手术视野更佳,更容易暴露睾丸并彻底游离精索,术中可在不牵扯切口的基础上打开腹外斜肌腱膜,便于术中高位结扎鞘状突或疝囊[13]。Saha-jeap术式需在阴囊做切口以固定睾丸,一方面发生感染的风险较大,另一方面睾丸固定在阴囊底,容易形成瘢痕黏连,导致阴囊皮肤内凹影响外观[14]。Bevan术式无需做阴囊切口,将阴囊底上翻后,采用弹性皮筋持续牵引睾丸,创伤更小,且避免了阴囊皮肤内凹的风险[15]。但传统Bevan术式的缺陷在于难以掌控牵引力量,且术后护理不便[16]。笔者在传统Bevan术式的基础上进行改良,采用针头逆向传递牵引线,避免了在阴囊切口处固定睾丸,同时无需上翻暴露阴囊底,在保留Bevan术式优势的基础上克服了其缺陷[17]

两种术式对比显示,实施改良Bevan术的A组患儿手术时间、术后肛门排气时间以及术后住院时间均短于B组,术中出血量少于B组,这与既往研究结论一致,证实改良Bevan术可以减少出血,减轻创伤,缩短术后恢复时间[18]

Cor、PGE2为反映机体应激反应的代表性指标。本研究中,A组患儿术后24 h血清Cor、PGE2水平均低于B组,证实改良Bevan术式创伤更小、术后应激反应更轻。这是由于改良Bevan术式与传统Saha-jeap术式相比,避免了对精索及睾丸的暴力拉扯,可在不损伤外环口的前提下打开腹外斜肌腱膜,且无需在阴囊部位取切口固定睾丸,最大限度减轻了手术创伤[19]。A组术后睾丸回缩、鞘膜积液等并发症的发生率更低,证实改良Bevan术式的安全性;两组术后复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),提示两种术式远期疗效相当。同时,A组术后伤口外观总满意度高于B组,分析其原因可能是改良Bevan术采用线牵引法,术后可避免阴囊水肿及瘀斑,且牵引线取出后无明显内凹或瘢痕,因此患儿家属满意度较高[20]

总之,改良Bevan术治疗小儿高位隐睾伴腹股沟斜疝创伤小,术后恢复更快,并发症少,术后应激反应相对轻微,术后伤口外观满意度较高,具有一定的临床应用价值。

利益冲突  所有作者声明不存在利益冲突

作者贡献声明  李春华负责数据收集,研究结果分析与讨论,论文设计、撰写;申琴负责文献检索,数据收集,研究结果分析与讨论,全文知识性内容的审读与修正

参考文献
[1]
盛捡云, 何佩娜, 王结实. 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎联合脐正中襞覆盖修补对小儿单侧腹股沟斜疝术后复发的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(8): 1146-1148.
Sheng JY, He PN, Wang JS. Application of laparoscopic high ligation of hernia sac combined withplus median umbilical fold in treatment of for unilateral inguinal hernia in children[J]. J Clin Res, 2021, 38(8): 1146-1148. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2021.08.008
[2]
齐灿, 张铁军, 周云, 等. 海氏三角途径腹腔镜下腹股沟管内高位隐睾引降固定术的临床分析[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2021, 42(5): 424-427.
Qi C, Zhang TJ, Zhou Y, et al. Clinical analysis of laparoscopic orchidopexy for high cryptorchidism around inguinal canal via Hesselbach route[J]. Chin J Pediatr Surg, 2021, 42(5): 424-427. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20200219-00098
[3]
陈星兆, 朱琳琳, 吕志宝, 等. 对侧鞘状突未闭的单侧腹股沟斜疝患儿发生异时疝的危险因素分析[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2022, 43(9): 816-821.
Chen XZ, Zhu LL, Lyu ZB, et al. Risk factors of metachronous unilateral inguinal hernia in children with contralateral patent processus vaginalis[J]. Chin J Pediatr Surg, 2022, 43(9): 816-821. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn421158-20210709-00343
[4]
Prabhu AS, Carbonell A, Hope W, et al. Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the RIVAL randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2020, 155(5): 380-387. DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034
[5]
杨周健, 向波, 刘钧, 等. 新生儿腹股沟嵌顿疝的诊治分析[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 20(4): 345-348.
Yang ZJ, Xiang B, Liu J, et al. Analysis of diagnosis and surgeryical therapy of incarcerated inguinal hernia in neonateswborns[J]. Chin J Minim Inva Surg, 2020, 20(4): 345-348. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2020.04.014
[6]
Priyadarshini K, Behera BK, Tripathy BB, et al. Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, and quadratus lumborum block for elective open inguinal hernia repair in children: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2022, 47(4): 217-221. DOI:10.1136/rapm-2021-103201
[7]
宋晋秋, 白东升, 郝春生, 等. 经腹腔镜Fowler-Stephens分期手术治疗患儿高位隐睾的临床观察[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(44): 3520-3524.
Song JQ, Bai DS, Hao CS, et al. Clinical efficacy of two-staged Fowler-Stephens laparoscopic orchidopexy in the treatment of for children with high cryptorchidism[J]. Natl Med J China, 2020, 100(44): 3520-3524. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200319-00839
[8]
Bugrul F, Abali ZY, Kirkgoz T, et al. Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome: a rare but important etiology of inguinal hernia and cryptorchidism[J]. Sex Dev, 2019, 13(5/6): 264-270. DOI:10.1159/000510466
[9]
Vikraman J, Donath S, Hutson JM. Frequency of inguinal herniotomy in Australia (1998-2017)[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2019, 35(7): 759-763. DOI:10.1007/s00383-019-04483-4
[10]
苏义林, 吕文强. 腹腔镜和经腹股沟开放手术治疗腹股沟型隐睾疗效的对比观察[J]. 安徽医药, 2021, 25(1): 51-54.
Su YL, Lyu WQ. Comparative observation on the efficacy of laparoscopic and versus transinguinal open surgery in the treatment of for inguinal cryptorchidism[J]. Anhui Med Pharm J, 2021, 25(1): 51-54. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2021.01.013
[11]
Zhu XH, Han XW, Zhang P, et al. A clinical study of minilaparoscopy in the treatment of cryptorchidism with an ipsilateral inguinal hernia[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2022, 32(3): 237-243. DOI:10.1089/lap.2020.1038
[12]
王文杰, 张潍平, 谢向辉, 等. 儿童腹股沟管隐睾睾丸扭转的治疗和预后分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 41(9): 687-691.
Wang WJ, Zhang WP, Xie XH, et al. Treatment and prognosis of children with torsion of inguinal cryptorchidism[J]. Chin J Urol, 2020, 41(9): 687-691. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20191115-00508
[13]
Li LW, Yang B, Liu D, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery approach of tunica vaginalis for palpable cryptorchidism[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2022, 32(9): 1122-1126. DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2022.09.1122
[14]
单王永, 洪盾. 小儿腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜术后复发的影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2020, 35(22): 4352-4355.
Shan WY, Hong D. Influencing factors of recurrence after indirect inguinal hernia laparoscopy[J]. Matern Child Health Care China, 2020, 35(22): 4352-4355. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.22.063
[15]
Fafaj A, Lo Menzo E, Alaedeen D, et al. Effect of intraoperative urinary catheter use on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2022, 157(8): 667-674. DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2205
[16]
Miller BT, Prabhu AS, Petro CC, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic inguinal hernia repair: 1-and 2-year outcomes from the RIVAL trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(1): 723-728. DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09320-9
[17]
Rutegård M, Lindqvist M, Svensson J, et al. Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: expertise-based randomized clinical trial of heavyweight or lightweight mesh[J]. Br J Surg, 2021, 108(2): 138-144. DOI:10.1093/bjs/znaa049
[18]
Li WM, Li YJ, Ding LL, et al. A randomized study on laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with hernia sac transection vs complete sac reduction[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(4): 1882-1886. DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-07303-x
[19]
Thölix AM, Kössi J, Harju J. Postoperative pain and pain-related health-care contacts after open inguinal hernia repair with Adhesix? and Progrip?: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(4): 1095-1104. DOI:10.1007/s10029-021-02549-8
[20]
Elbatarny AM, Khairallah MG, Elsayed MM, et al. Laparoscopic repair of pediatric inguinal hernia: disconnection of the hernial sac versus disconnection and peritoneal closure[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(8): 927-934. DOI:10.1089/lap.2018.0679