Bao Jingfeng,Sun Hailiang,Zhuang Wenjun,et al.Analysis of curative effect of loop drainage on children with superficial abscess[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2020,19(12):1140-1144.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2020.12.015]
套环引流术治疗小儿体表脓肿的疗效分析
- Title:
- Analysis of curative effect of loop drainage on children with superficial abscess
- 分类号:
- R726.1
- 摘要:
- 目的 本文旨在介绍一种治疗小儿体表脓肿的新方法——套环引流术，并与传统脓肿切开引流术的疗效进行对比。方法 回顾性分析南通大学附属常州市儿童医院2018年1月至2019年3月接受手术治疗的63例单纯体表脓肿患者资料，其中男性38例，女性25例；其中33例采用传统脓肿切开引流术（传统切开引流组），30例采用套环引流术（套环引流组），对两组患者手术时间、术后疼痛评分、愈合时间、复发率、伤口长度及术后换药次数等资料进行统计学分析。结果 63例均为单纯体表脓肿，无其它合并症。脓肿位置分布情况：头颈部16例，四肢20例，躯干部18例，臀部9例。套环引流术组手术时间（8±2）min，中位愈合时间12 d，复发率0%（0/30），伤口长度（4±1.5）mm，术后疼痛评分为（3±0.8）分；传统切开引流组手术时间（7±2.5）min，中位愈合时间13 d，复发率9%（3/33），伤口长度（21±4.5）mm，术后疼痛评分为（8±0.6）分。两组术后愈合时间、伤口长度和疼痛程度差异均具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 套环引流术治疗小儿体表脓肿具有伤口美观、术后疼痛轻、操作及术后护理简便等优点，且疗效满意，可一定程度上替代传统的脓肿切开引流手术，值得在小儿外科领域推广应用。
- Abstract:
- Objective To introduce a new treatment of loop drainage technique for pediatric superficial abscess and compare it with conventional incision and drainage for observing its efficacy. Methods Retrospective analyses were conducted for 63 surgical cases of simple superficial abscess from January 2018 to March 2019.There were 38 boys and 25 girls.Among them,33 cases underwent conventional incision and drainage while another 30 cases had loop drainage.The clinical data of operative duration,postoperative pain score,average healing time,recurrence rate,wound length and postoperative frequency of dressing changes were compared and statistically analyzed. Results All cases were simple superficial abscess without other complications,including head & neck (n=16),extremities (n=20),trunk (n=18) and buttocks (n=9).The operative duration of loop drainage was (8±2) min with an median healing time of 12 days,a recurrence rate of 0%(0/30) and an average wound length of (21±4.5) mm.The median healing time was 12 days.The average wound length (4±1.5) mm,the postoperative pain score is(3±0.8).The operative duration of conventional abscess incision and drainage was (7±2.5) min with an average healing time of 13 days,a recurrence rate of 9% (3/33) and an average wound length of (21±4.5) mm,the postoperative pain score is(8±0.6).The inter-group differences were statistically significant in postoperative healing time,wound length and pain degree.Conclusion For pediatric superficial abscess,loop drainage offers the advantages of minimal & aesthetic wound,milder postoperative pain,simpler handling & postoperative care and satisfactory outcomes.It can replace traditional abscess incision and drainage surgery and is worthy of wider promotion during pediatric surgery.
参考文献/References:
1 Tomlinson D,von Baeyer CL,Stinson JN,et al.A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children[J].Pediatrics,2010,126(5):e1168-e1198.DOI:10.1542/peds.2010-1609.
2 Singer AJ,Richman PB,Kowalska A,et al.Comparison of patient and practitioner assessments of pain from commonly performed emergency department procedures[J].Ann Emerg Med,1999,33(6):652-658.DOI:10.1016/S0196-0644(99)80003-1.
3 Kortesluoma RL,Nikkonen M,Serlo W."You just have to make the pain go away"children’s experiences of pain management[J].Pain Manag Nurs,2008,9(4):143-149.DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2008.07.002.
4 舒强,钭金法.加速康复外科在小儿外科中的应用与展望[J].临床小儿外科志,2019,18(4):253-256.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2019.04.001. Shu Q,Tou JF.Applications and future prospects of enhanced recovery after surgery during pediatric surgery[J].J Clin Ped Sur,2019,18(4):253-256.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2019.04.001.
5 Anaya DA,Dellinger EP.Sabiston textbook of surgery[M].Philadelphia:Elsevier Saunders,2004:264.
6 O’Malley GF,Dominici P,Giraldo P,et al.Routine Packing of Simple Cutaneous Abscesses Is Painful and Probably Unnecessary[J].Acad Emerg Med,2009,16(5):470-473.DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00409.
7 Tsoraides SS,Pearl RH,Stanfill AB,et al.Incision and loop drainage:a minimally invasive technique for subcutaneous abscess management in children[J].J Pediatr Surg,2010,45(3):606-609.DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.06.013.
8 Aprahamian CJ,Nashad HH,DiSomma NM,et al.Treatment of subcutaneous abscesses in children with incision and loop drainage:A simplified method of care[J].J Pediat Surg,2017,52(9):1438-1441.DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.12.018.
9 McNamara WF,Hartin CW,Escobar MA,et al.An alternative to open incision and drainage for community-acquired soft tissue abscesses in Children[J].J Pediatr Surg,2011,46(3):502-506.DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.019.
10 Thompson DO.Loop drainage of cutaneous abscesses using a modified sterile glove:apromising technique[J].J Emerg Med,2014,47(2):188-191.DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.04.035.
11 Gottlieb M,Peksa GD.Comparison of the loop technique with incision and drainage for soft tissue abscesses:A systematic review and meta-an-alysis[J].Am J Emerg Med,2018,36(1):128-133.DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.007.
12 徐宾,马骁.穿刺治疗小儿常见体表脓肿[J].中国普通外科杂志,1996,5(4):235-236. Xu B,Ma X.Puncture therapy for common superficial abscess in children[J].Chinese Journal of General Surgery,1996.5(4):235-236.
13 韩得山,吴茂军,田茂良,等.多孔针治疗深部脓肿[J].临床小儿外科志,2003,2(3):223-224.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2003.03.024. Han DS,Wu MJ,Tian ML,et al.Treatment of Abscess in the Deepish by polyporous[J].J Clin Ped Sur,2003,2(3):223-224.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2003.03.024.
14 吴萍,谭晓燕.前庭大腺脓肿套环引流疗效观察[J].中国误诊学杂志,2012,12(1):71. Wu P,Tan XY.Curative effect of loop drainage for bartholin gland abscess[J].Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics,2012,12(1):71.
15 茆军,邢润麟,范东华,等.环形对口引流技术联合中药治疗骨与软组织感染9例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(11):46-48. Mao J,Xing RL,Fan DH,et al.9 cases of bone and soft tissue infection were treated by Counterpart drainage combined with traditional Chinese medicine[J].Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopeics,2018,26(11):46-48.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-03-18。
通讯作者:包景峰,Email:bjf198069@163.com