Zhu Yi,Du Zhen,Wang Lina,et al.Application of ultrasonically-guided radial arterial cannulation in infants[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2019,18(08):699-702.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2019.08.016]
超声引导在婴儿桡动脉穿刺置管中的应用
- Title:
- Application of ultrasonically-guided radial arterial cannulation in infants
- Keywords:
- Punctures; Radial Artery/US; Infant
- 分类号:
- R445.1;R45
- 摘要:
- 目的 探讨超声引导技术在婴儿桡动脉穿刺置管中的应用价值。方法 选择80例1岁以下需行桡动脉穿刺置管的手术患儿，随机分为超声引导组（n=40）和传统触摸组（n=40）。超声引导组采用超声引导法进行穿刺和置管，传统触摸组采用指尖触摸法进行定位和穿刺置管，分别记录每组患儿的穿刺时间、穿刺次数，比较两组的首次穿刺成功率、总成功率、首次穿刺成功时间、总穿刺时间、穿刺次数及套管针使用数量。结果 超声引导组首次穿刺成功率和总成功率分别为72.5%和97.5%，传统触摸组首次穿刺成功率和总成功率分别为50%和80%，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。超声引导组有1例穿刺失败，更换穿刺部位后穿刺成功。传统触摸组有8例穿刺失败，改超声引导后全部穿刺成功。超声引导组总穿刺时间（66.6±56.9）s，明显短于传统触摸组的（120±94.9）s，差异有统计学意义（t=3.052，P=0.003）。两组首次穿刺成功所需时间分别为（36.3±16.2）s和（38.3±19.1）s，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。超声引导组总穿刺次数少于传统触摸组[1（1~2）vs.1.5（1~3）]（χ2=3.900，P<0.05）。与传统触摸组相比，超声引导组使用穿刺针数量较少[1（1~1）vs.1（1~2）]，差异有统计学意义（χ2=3.464，P<0.05）。传统触摸组有7例（17.5%）出现动脉血肿及出血等并发症，而超声引导组仅1例（2.5%）出现并发症，差异有统计学意义（χ2=4.507，P<0.05）。结论 围术期婴儿行桡动脉穿刺置管时使用超声引导技术可有效提高穿刺成功率，缩短穿刺时间，降低穿刺相关并发症，值得临床推广应用。
- Abstract:
- Objective To explore the ultrasonically-guided radial arterial cannulation in infants.Methods Eighty surgical infants aged 1-12 months requiring an arterial catheter were randomly divided into ultrasonically-guided and classic palpation groups.The ultrasonic device was employed for radial arterial cannulation in ultrasonically-guided group.And,for infants in classic palpation group,classic palpation was used for determining the position of radial artery.Period of puncture time and numbers of attempts were recorded.And initial attempt success rate,total success rate,time to success,time to initial attempt and mean number of attempts were compared between two groups.Results Compare to the classic palpation group,initial attempt rate and total success for ultrasound guided group were higher (72.5% vs 50%,97.5% vs 80%)(P<0.05).One failed puncture case was present in ultrasonically-guided group and punctures succeed after replacing puncture site.In classic palpation group,all eight failed cases during puncturing were successfully performed under ultrasonic guidance.The mean time to success for ultrasonically-guided group were shorter than that for classic palpation group[(66.6±56.9) vs (120±94.9)s,t=3.052,P=0.003].Time to initial attempt success was not significantly different between two groups[(36.3±16.2) vs (38.3±19.1)s](P>0.05).The frequency of attempts for ultrasonically-guided group was less than those for classic palpation group[1(1~2) vs 1.5(1~3)],(χ2=3.900,P<0.05).The number of needles used in ultrasonically-guided group was less than those in classic palpation group[1(1~1) vs 1(1~2)] (χ2=3.464,P<0.05),cannulation complications were lower in ultrasonically-guided group than those in classic palpation group (1 vs 7) (χ2=4.507,P<0.05). Conclusion The application of ultrasonically-guided technology is reliable for radial artery cannulation in infants.It may improve the success rate,allow for faster cannulation and result in fewer complications.
参考文献/References:
1 Miller AG,Bardin AJ.Review of Ultrasound-Guided radial artery catheter placement[J].Respir Care,2016,61(3):383-388.DOI:10.4187/respcare.04190.
2 Lee D,Kim JY,Kim HS,et al.Ultrasound evaluation of the radial artery for arterial catheterization in healthy anesthetized patients[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2016,30(2):215-219.DOI:10.1007/s10877-015-9704-9.
3 Nakayama Y,Nakajima Y,Sessler DI,et al.A novel method for ultrasound-guided radial arterial catheterization in pediatric patients[J].Anesth Analg,2014,118(5):1019-1026.DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000164.
4 杜真,张溪英,屈双权.超声技术在小儿麻醉中的应用进展[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2015,14(5):428-432.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2015.05.024.Du Z,Zhang XY,Qu SQ.Application of ultrasonic technology in pediatric anesthesia[J].J Clin Ped Sur,2015,14(5):428-432.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6353.2015.05.024.
5 Gu WJ,Wu XD,Wang F,et al.Ultrasound guidance facilitates radial artery catheterization a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Chest,2016,149(1):166-179.DOI:10.1378/chest.15-1784.
6 李继,陈堃,柯希建,等.掌上超声定位在桡动脉穿刺置管中的临床应用[J].临床麻醉学,2018,34(2):123-125.DOI:10.12089/jca.2018.02.004.Li J,Chen K,Ke XJ,et al.Clinical application of pocket-sized ultrasound localization on radial artery cannulation[J].J Clin Anesthesiol,2018,34(2):123-125.DOI:10.12089/jca.2018.02.004.
7 梅伟,金传刚,张毅,等.超声定位与盲法用于创伤后循环不稳患者桡动脉穿刺的比较[J].临床外科杂志,2011,19(3):199-201.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2011.03.024.Mei W,Jin CQ,Zhang Y,et al.Comparison of ultrasound-guided and conventional radial artery cannulation in hemodynamically unstable patients with traumatic injury[J].J Clin Surg,2011,19(3):199-201.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2011.03.024.
8 Moore CL.Ultrasound first,second,and last for vascular access[J].J Ultrasound Med,2014,33(7):1135-1142.DOI:10.7863/ultra.33.7.1135.
9 Kucuk A,Yuce HH,Yalcin F,et al.Forty-five degree wrist angulation is optimal for ultrasound guided long axis radial artery cannulation in patients over 60 years old:A randomized study[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2014,28(6):567-572.DOI:10.1007/s10877-014-9552-z.
10 Tsuchiya M,Mizutani K,Funai Y,et al.In-line positioning of ultrasound images using wireless remote display system with tablet computer facilitates ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization[J].J Clin Monit Comput,2016,30(1):101-106.DOI:10.1007/s10877-015-9692-9.
11 Ishii S,Shime N,Shibasaki M,et al.Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization in infants and small children[J].Pediatr Crit Care Med,2013,14(5):471-473.DOI:10.1097/PCC.0b013e31828a8657.
12 Omid M,Rafiei MH,Hosseinpour M,et al.Ultrasound-guided percutaneous central venous catheterization in infants:learning curve and related complications[J].Adv Biomed Res,2015,4:199.DOI:10.4103/2277-9175.166135.
相似文献/References:
[1]李长春 王珊 章均 欧阳军 孔祥如 杨超 赵珍珍 吕麟亚. B超引导下芯针穿刺活检术诊断儿童实体肿瘤的临床分析[J].临床小儿外科杂志,2011,10(04):247.
[J].Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery,2011,10(08):247.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2018-05-20。
基金项目:湖南省科技计划项目基金资助（编号：S2012F1023）
通讯作者:屈双权,Email:qushuangquan1974@163.com